User talk:Anthonzi

Please stop attacking the LOSJ article

Look, I can understand that you mean well --but you have not been able to address the fact (as pointed out in the talk page) that having such information is appropriate in video game related articles on Wikipedia. Because its status as one of the worst game for the system can be cited, it cannot be said to have a POV problem --in fact, if you can find positive reviews then maybe we can have them as a minority opinion alongside it. But if you continue to remove information, I will begin warnings because you're no longer following proper procedure. --Bobak (talk) 16:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I noticed in the talk page of the "Names of God" you asked what was G_d. It's what Jews use sometimes to shorten the name of God because they think it's sometimes unholy to say His name. Don't ask me why, I'm just a Christian.

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Boxxy. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 02:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't attack anyone. Just an objective observation.Anthonzi (talk) 02:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

You know that you can edit make make your user page whatever you want.Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 20:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah and I choose to leave it blank. I'm not a narcissist and prefer to be anonymous. Got a problem with that?Anthonzi (talk) 06:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

vv31c0m3

Deleting this so that next time I ask a serious question someone will copy/paste the same macro on here again. (2nd deletion) lulz --Anthonzi (talk) 05:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Columbine High School massacre#"Dubious" tag

Please respond to the posting at this page regarding your tagging. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Emperor of Japan. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 04:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please define a personal attack. I don't need to defend myself at all at this point. Look at the statement objectively. There is absolutely nothing defamatory about it.--Anthonzi (talk) 05:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Telling someone to go away and edit a different-language Wikipedia is an unacceptable attack.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not tell them to go away. It was a practical suggestion.--Anthonzi (talk) 04:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the comment I made in question:

You should probably stick to editting the Japanese wikipedia until your English proficiency increases significantly.--Anthonzi (talk) 03:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Notice the qualifier probably. I did not demand anything. He can do whatever he'd like. But my opinion stands that edits with the same level of English as in the original post would be counter productive.--Anthonzi (talk) 04:56, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anthonzi, you are cordially invited to WP:ANI#Personal attacks by User:Anthonzi ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 04:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A cordial invitation would be a rational explanation as to why you consider my comment offensive. All I have seen so far is hot air and a strawman.--Anthonzi (talk) 05:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To anyone who still takes exception to my comment, please take special note of the later sentences in the two paragraphs of Wikipedia:NPA#Avoiding_personal_attacks.

...A posting that says "Your statement about X is wrong because of information at Y", or "The paragraph you inserted into the article looks like original research", is not a personal attack. Or sometimes you could say instead—"The paragraph inserted here [DIFF] into the article looks like original research", which also is not a personal attack, and avoids referring to the other editor in the second person; providing the DIFF also cuts down confusion. Similarly, discussion of a user's conduct is not in itself a personal attack when done in the appropriate forum for such discussion (e.g. the user's talk page, WP:WQA, WP:ANI).

...The appropriate response to inflammatory statements is to address the issues of content rather than to accuse the other person of violating this policy. Accusing someone without justification of making personal attacks is also considered a form of personal attack.--Anthonzi (talk) 04:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cptnono (talk) 05:38, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Apologies for the template. I noticed that you use your talk page. There is currently a discussion on the new SSCS vessel. Adding material and removing templates requesting clarification are not acceptable. Please do not continue.Cptnono (talk) 05:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What? I added sources to things that were already there.--Anthonzi (talk) 05:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the talk page discussion Cptnono (talk) 05:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RS

Do not insert material without RS again. As discussed, the line from the (amended) self-published source is being used for now at SSCS and the vessel article. Facebook is not a source. eccorazzi is "the latest in green gossip" and other blogs/gossip sites contradict that it has been acquired. It is not confirmed that it has been acquired in secondary reliable sources. Period. There has already been sock puppetry and one IP (who is more than likely connected or on a mailing list) has already admitted that they cannot get a hold of the oner of the boat. Any more shenanigans and I will seek a restriction on your editing. A line at SSCS is sufficient for now. You will have to wait until the 6th when it is officially announced and secondary sources are available.Cptnono (talk) 06:39, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

check your diff before making false accusations

Errr ... that was done after my edit, by an IP. Please do not make haughty accusations without checking your own diffs. What you point to (Star City -> Start Cityv) would be a highly unusual fault in a script, anyway. Tony (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. Check the diff again.--Anthonzi (talk) 10:05, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Common Law, U.S. Federal

You added a "Wikify" tag for Common Law / United States federal system (1789 and 1938). What's the issue? Boundlessly (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Murder of Laci Peterson

An article that you have been involved in editing, Murder of Laci Peterson, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. pablo 13:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]