User talk:Amy foster

Chikurubi Prison

Hi, Amy. I'm just wondering why you keep on adding and then quickly deleting large chunks of text about an alleged massacre at Chikurubi Prison. Are you trying something out, or looking for assistance, or something else? Tlhslobus (talk) 05:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gordon Ramsay. Continuing to make test edits in article space is unacceptable, regardless of whether you self-revert. You may blank your talk page, but the record of past warnings remains, and in your case it is lengthy. Please consider this your final warning. Rivertorch^FIRE _WATER 18:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at grass court. ENOUGH!!!! Using Wikipedia articles to non-neutrally push your favorite player as the best ever is UTTERLY UNNACCEPTABLE!! Stop or you will be permanently blocked!!! oknazevad (talk) 01:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zimbabwean general election, 2008

With regards to your recent addition to this article, I checked the source and found that the number of MDC supporters killed was 153 not 1,530 as you stated. I also cannot seem to find the 4,000 figure anywhere in the source. Could you confirm the exact page where this is stated? Number 5 7 13:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning—you have been identified

You have made a series of malicious edits to the Elvis Presely article that identify you almost certainly as the longtime troll Onefortyone. All of your malicious edits (such as the series of three encapsulated here: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Elvis_Presley&type=revision&diff=810358892&oldid=810357686, in which you falsified a verifiable quote and through multiple "awkward edits" sought to hide that fact), are being reverted, and I will do everything in my power to ensure that you never again succeed in disrupting and subverting the article. DCGeist (talk) 23:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Presley

Any further trolling at Talk:Elvis Presley‎ will be met with an indefinite block. Wikipedia is not the place to push sensational fringe theories published on gossip sites. --Laser brain (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heynatz

Nope. Vandalism. The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please go away. If you persist in making these false claims, you will be banned from editing. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised your behaviour at WP:ANI. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

To enforce an arbitration decision and for persistently violating the policy on biographies of living persons on the page Erika Heynatz, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. GoldenRing (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

After the first year this will revert to a normal block and you may request unblock using the normal methods; until then you can only appeal to me, at WP:AE or WP:AN. GoldenRing (talk) 08:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given the egregious and continuing BLP violations relating to Erika Heynatz via IPs and new accounts, it is my view that the reset should start from the end of IP abuse, and that I will oppose any unblock as long as the trolling continues. Acroterion (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Latest sock activity [[1]] Acroterion (talk) 11:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing as multiple anon IP socks at Talk:Victoria Azarenka. 86.129.173.233, 86.163.24.39, 86.138.165.62, 86.129.175.162, 86.141.10.128, 86.133.47.178, 86.138.222.72,... We either need a range block on these ips or protection at Talk:Victoria Azarenka. Trouble is Talk:Johanna Konta has also been hit with one of these IP's. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another today at Talk:Victoria Azarenka... 86.143.234.202. Seems to be originating from Chelmsford, UK. Any way to report Amy to their IP? Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It continues non-abated. Here where it was reverted by an administrator for something I can't see, and also here in disrupting the Roger Federer talk page. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And it continues... here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fyunck(click), I suppose you know it's still going on. I am going to drop blocks on a couple of IPs, if only to leave a paper trail. Acroterion, GoldenRing, I don't know if there is much we can do, but this crazy shit, of posting what seem to be copied and pasted newspaper reports on talk pages, we have to do something. Drmies (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is this not Aries009? Drmies (talk) 00:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... Every time I see it I tag the IP as an Amy Foster clone. It seems to be endless, and most of the time they revert what they write. I'm not sure who the original sockmaster is. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I've had a look at a rangeblock but it would be a /10, ie about 0.1% of the entire internet (the BT ISP in the UK). The collateral damage makes it impractical. I'll take a bit more of a look later today and see if there's anything that can be done with a filter, or whether protection could be applied narrowly enough to make it a feasible defense against this. GoldenRing (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Any way to contact BT ISP and inform them of the trouble? Maybe they can narrow the point of attack down a bit more. Yeah, if the vandalizer is going from starbucks to starbucks probably not, but if they are using a particular library or office maybe the ISP will lend a hand? Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they can be contacted. I'll drop them an email later today. I'm not sure BT have a dazzling reputation for dealing with these sorts of things, but we'll see, I guess. GoldenRing (talk) 08:50, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. Yeah, probably nothing will materialize from your contacting them, but everyone here appreciates your effort. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've sent the email. GoldenRing (talk) 10:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of course they will simply flood other articles also. See User:86.185.251.86, User:81.129.42.73, etc... Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And continues flooding Sampras and Kerber with IP 81.129.191.186. They are the never-ending megaphone of ridiculousness. Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:15, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]