User talk:Amitrochates/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Kashmir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nizam Uddin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Fixed Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 20:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Outdent

FYI: I moved your outdent in PROUT so that the thread was a bit more obvious for my comments. Cheers! Location (talk) 16:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for informing me. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 16:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Chach

Hello! I noticed you've been active around the Chach Nama articles today; thanks very much for contributing. I've gone ahead and created a task force from WikiProject History; hopefully, it can serve as a sort of guide for people interested in improving WP's coverage of this area. Thanks again for your help. dci | TALK 04:23, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm glad I could help you with such an interesting topic and thanks for the hard work on WP:CHACH. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 04:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Fixed Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 17:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

No that bad

Not as bad as Joshi's. In the right side column, there is a list of "most popular etc thread, start with that here --Tito Dutta (contact) 21:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

I have seen worse. You must have heard about the Cow cocktail. Five ingredients from Cow: milk, ghee, curd, urine and dung mixed into one potent mixture. Yuk!! Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 21:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ongoing battle over Prabhat Rainjan Sarkar-related articles. Thank you. Mangoe (talk) 04:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for informing me. I generally stay away from ANI, but will participate in this one. It's about time this issue comes to some sort of a resolution. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 04:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Hi, Thanks a lot for taking up and completing the comprehensive review of Vedaranyam with such precision. The comments were very constructive and i am taking this as an input for other articles i am editing. Once again, thanks a lot. Ssriram mt (talk) 12:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Also, the effort has been taken note by experienced editor like Dr. Blofeld here - would like to share these credits with you.Ssriram mt (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Sharing credits from Dr. Blofeld

	The Special Barnstar
	For getting Vedaranyam up to GA. Lovely to see quality for a smaller town in India! Keep up the good work and may we see many more! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Ssriram for two barnstars in a day, even one is encouraging, but two is something special. I was amazed to find that 7/31 GAs in this category had been promoted because of your effort. Please keep up the good work, WP:IN needs more editors like you. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 00:14, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

RFC which you took part in

This message is given to you because you took part in a RfC not so long ago on this page about pretty much the same topic. That RfC was allegedly closed too soon.
See Request for comment III on Rape culture talk. Please comment if you'd like. Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 06:41, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

On Mother India: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mother India/archive1

Work has been started in the theme section. You can intermittently check. --Dwaipayan (talk) 23:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

I am keeping an eye on it. Do you want me to comment already, or should I wait till you've integrated and copy–edited all of the new content? Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 23:37, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. Can you please take a look and strike out addressed comments and let us look if we are on the right track. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 19:14, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Further views? Indeed you can go ahead and make some changes in the article. Of course, if we do not agree with the edits, we would discuss the rationale (but that seems unlikely).--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:44, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

I can only make minor contributions to the article if at all. Reviewers have to be dispassionate about the articles they review. If I start contributing there, I'll lose the ability to spot problems with it. Do you remember editor's block? Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 15:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for striking the Oppose. Your comments helped us to achieve comprehensiveness.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Indeed. Your review of the theme section was extra-ordinary, and linking to appropriate books was so helpful. Moreover, we used your words/language in the article as those seemed exceptionally well-written and nicely paraphrased.

And yes, I remember that review of Gita, and your comment :)--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you both for your gracious comments and for seeing my obsession with the themes section in a positive light. :) In case any of you are wondering, I am waiting for someone to okay the prose before supporting. If no one does that over the next week or so, I'll support it regardless. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 16:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for letting us know. Do you see any problem with new "Themes" prose or other sentences in particular. We could address it or request the article's chief copyeditor Rothorpe to take a look. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

FYI. Modified some formatting of your vote so that Wikipedia:Nominations Viewer does not see oppose. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

No worries. I'll have to take a deeper look at what appears to be a well–written prose to pick out any problems, which is partly why I am hoping someone else will do it. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 19:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

No problem if you do that. You can either change the prose yourself, or suggest improvement in the talk page or in FAC. We, the main three contributors, are probably suffering from editor's block :p--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Quote

Just read the quote about freedom on your talk page, awesome !! --sarvajna (talk) 14:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

It resonated with me too the first time I read it. It's amazing what a poor man who lived in a slum in Mumbai could come up with. No, I am not this person. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 00:11, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Where is the quote? And about quotes, I read in a (paper) book, this is Vivekananda's quote. But, could not find any verification! --Tito Dutta (contact) 00:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Found that Nisargadatta's quote. Everything related to Dutta/Datta is always a matter of glory! --Tito Dutta (contact) 00:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Rofl!! Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 00:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

It's amazing what a poor man who lived in a slum in Mumbai could come up with. No, I am not this person LOL --sarvajna (talk) 12:01, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for helping in Mother India. The comments in fac were incredibly good.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm glad I could help. Independence Day (India) could use some of your skills too. Not immediately though, we still have a few months to go. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 11:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

RfC regarding inclusion of a subsection of Metaphilosophy in the article on Philosophy

An RfC concerning addition of a subsection to Philosophy can be found at this location. Please comment upon its inclusion and any modifications you think would help make it better. Brews ohare (talk) 20:40, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Ayurveda

I have replied at my talk, could you independently review this please Template:Did you know nominations/All I Want Is Everything (film)? --Tito Dutta (contact) 09:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Sure. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 09:19, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Mythological content in historical section

The information added in the Date, Place and Context section of the Manusmṛti page was replaced during this edit and the factual information was replaced with mythological dates and content. These do not belong to a historical section. Please remove it and replace it with its original content which was

The text shows the obvious influence of previous Dharmasutras and Arthasastric work. These eighteen Titles of Law or Grounds for Litigation make up more than one fifth of the work and deal primarily with matters of the king, state, and judicial procedure.

Though most scholars had previously considered the text a composite put together over a long period of time, Olivelle has recently argued that the complex and consistent structure of the text suggests a single author. However, no details of this eponymous author's life are known, though it is likely that he belonged to a conservative Brahmin caste somewhere in Northern India.

The reasons given by the user who did this edit for replacing the information in that section are ideologically/politically biased, not supported by any archaeological and historical evidence, and are either completely unproven or any conclusive evidence supporting these claims is absent.

This user has also done many similar edits on pages relating to Indian mythology and history by adding mythological content and dates to historical content, and by adding unproven archaeological/historical contents to pages relating to Indian mythology, especially to pages relating to Bhrigu and Dhosi Hill, as can be seen from this user's contributions. Most of the information added is either directly cited from mythological texts or is politically biased, non-factual and contrary to any information obtained from archaeological, geological and historical evidence.

Something must be done to remove the misleading non-factual information from all these pages and to prevent this user from non-factual information to more pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.225.253.207 (talk) 01:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I please request for the Manusmṛti page to be reviewed to remove non-factual and misleading content presenting mythological content as being factual, and for other misleading content with the intention of presenting it as reality and glorifying it using unproven claims.

The user User:Sudhirkbhargava has made many misleading edits to that page that present mythological events unproven by archaeology as real historical events, and also provides other misleading information presenting the mythological figure Manu as a historical person whose laws were followed in South-East Asia before the rise of Buddhism in India, although no credible evidence for all these claims exist that are accepted by mainstream archaeology and historical sources.

Here is a compilation of all the misleading edits made to this page.

Please do something to remove these edits which are very misleading and also make people lose faith in Wikipedia's reliability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.224.81.231 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

You have a valid point 197.*, just give me some time to go through it. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 07:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I came here to find reliable references to use for academic research and I was so deeply offended by these misleading edits that I had to correct them in the pages that are not blocked although I have never edited or contacted anyone on Wikipedia before.

Wikipedia is meant to be an unbiased and reliable source of factual information and publishing such unreliable and biased information is unacceptable. The said user who did these edits has been doing similar edits to the articles for Bhrigu, Manu and Bhargava and to pages relating to them, his username is sudhirkbhargava and he cited a person by the name of Sudhir Bhargava in his edits. Because Bhargava means descendant of Bhrigu I suspect he might be doing these edits to prove his own personal ancestry as being real and to glorify it. This is completely unacceptable for a reliable and unbiased source of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.224.91.49 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

ARE you joking??? Wikipedia is incredibly biased. See for example this link

facepalm Sudhirkbhargava has been asked not to add very early dates, such as 10,000 years old, as reliable historical information by many uninvolved editors at RSN because of WP:Redflag and Fringe theory concerns. It looks like someone needs to supervise his edits and maybe even adopt the user. Thank you for bringing this up here. I'll take this up with other editors. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 11:42, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for taking notice of my request. Please take the necessary actions quickly because he keeps on reverting the changes when someone removes his misleading edits. I removed his edits to Drsadvati River three days ago and he reverted them today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.224.95.251 (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I have taken this up with Tito Dutta here. You have reverted the problematic content in most of the articles, but if your edits are reverted again, feel free to ask for Titodutta's opinion/help. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 11:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. This problem needs to be solved permanently soon because I can't and don't want to engage in an edit war with a Wikipedia user. This was the first time I edited anything on Wikipedia and probably the last time I will edit anything on Wikipedia because I edited and contacted users only because it was an exceptional case of very misleading edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.225.241.102 (talk) 20:42, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom

FYI: I saw your post a few minutes after I posted this. Location (talk) 06:39, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Just let me complete the process, I'll reply in detail at the ANI. Filing an Arbitration request might not be required for this. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 06:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

I intend to start a draft, however, I won't file anything just yet. Location (talk) 06:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

We're you planning on posting further in the ANI? As far as I'm concerned, we can sit back for a bit on all of this since there appears to be a bit of a ceasefire. Location (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I decided not to post at ANI after EdJohnston's intervention gave us a reprieve. In fact, I resisted an urge to comment here. We can sit back peacefully for now, but if an email has been sent to ARBCOM we might have to present those diffs anyway. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 20:54, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Parents' Worship Day

See the article Parents' Worship Day --Tito Dutta (contact) 06:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Yet another promotional article written by an SPA most probably associated with the Ashram. If this is not notable we can simply PROD it. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 10:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maithil Brahmin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

 Fixed. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 10:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Amitrochates. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--sarvajna (talk) 18:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

My internet connection has been horrible for the last few hours. Don't ask me how I messed this up. Please send the email again. I'll reply as soon as I receive it, if internet permits. :( Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 19:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Done!!--sarvajna (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Received and replied. You need not have sobered down your second email. I have absolutely no issues with howlers as long as they are emailed and not posted on my talk page. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 16:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Amitrochates. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_India/Collaborations_of_the_month#Update.3F.
Message added 08:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tito Dutta (contact) 08:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Replied. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 12:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

INCOTM

Oh wow! Great! i was just thinking to clean up the nominations page, and found you just did it! Great men think alike.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Ha! I thought of doing that a couple of days ago, but only started today. I guess lazy many think alike too. :) Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 18:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

He he :) No, I don't watch your talk page, but I can start watching now. Even then, I am ok with ugly talk back messages.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Bye the way, Tripura is in FAC.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

OK, I will go through those instructions. But I liked his bastards guide for FAC more :)--Dwaipayan (talk) 00:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, it is the bastards guide! LoL--Dwaipayan (talk) 00:46, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

If you have an interest, please have a look at Kahaani, it is currently in peer review.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

You may find this interesting

Have a look at Tarakeswar affair, which is currently a GA nominee.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:43, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I have copy-pasted your comments in my talk page to the GA nomination page.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Replied to your comments. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Replied. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 19:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

If you think the concerns have been satisfactorily addressed, please indicate that in the review page.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:50, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Asaram Bapu

Keep an eye Asaram Bapu. most recently Single event misinterpreted as general information, Unnecessary use of capiatl H in "His" etc! --Tito Dutta (contact) 19:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

This went surprisingly well. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 21:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

• Come to ACC! It is interesting! You need to sen identification to WMF! All others you qualify --Tito Dutta (contact) 22:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

• Committing my real life identity is unacceptable, sorry. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 22:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: Modi lead

That is very flattering. :) Done.—indopug (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Amitrochates. You have new messages at Talk:Swami_Vivekananda#Authorized_sampradayas_as_per_the_Puranas.
Message added 17:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I got very much puzzled, I hope you can give a better answer! Tito Dutta (contact) 17:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Replied, that should do it for now, unless the editor can come up with better sources. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 19:10, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Sholay is in peer review.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Modi

I do not want to revert your edits(might revert after your explanation) , but I do see some merits in YKs changes, he did not remove the mention of 2002 violence from the article, 2002 violence was the biggest section in the article which is completely undue. Would you like to tell us your rationale on the talk page ?--sarvajna (talk) 17:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I am slightly strapped on time, otherwise I would have explained my edits by now. I will give an explanation shortly. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 17:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Just felt that I was bit rude in my discussion although that was not my intention, sorry about that. No hard feelings. We do have some work to do there. I appreciate your work. --sarvajna (talk) 13:28, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't perceive your arguments as being rude in any way, but thanks for clarifying. I appreciate the work you've done on that article too. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 18:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey CK, what else needs to be done also is the POV tag still valid? -sarvajna (talk) 15:14, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Paoli Dam

Sayeen Itna Deejiye, Ja Mein Kutumb Samaye
Main Bhi Bhookha Na Rahun, Sadhu Na Bhookha Jaye.

Good work at Kabir. In case you are alive and kicking, could you review Template:Did you know nominations/Paoli Dam's article? --Tito Dutta (contact) 07:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Perumal

I have recently 5x expanded Ajit Singh of Khetri and submitted for DYK. Could you help to expand Alasinga Perumal a bit? Specially the section which discussed how Perumal's relation with Vivekananda? this might be helpful --Tito Dutta (contact) 18:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry Tito, due to RL issues, I can't devote more time to Wikipedia. I have restricted myself to minor reverts and occasional comments. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 18:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

What is RL issue?--Tito Dutta (contact) 19:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

RL is Real life. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 19:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

O I thought Rocket Launcher --Tito Dutta (contact) 19:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Ha ha... no, I don't work for ISRO. :) Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 19:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Amitrochates. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#2013_Bangladesh_India_WikiProjects_dispute_resolution.
Message added 18:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Important Tito Dutta (contact) 18:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

INCOTM

Hi, you are receiving this message because your name is listed at Wikipedia:INCOTM/Members, where people indicate their interest in the India Project Collaboration of the Month (INCOTM).

INCOTM is restarting and you are welcome to nominate articles for collaborative improvement during July 2013. - Sitush (talk) 12:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Amitrochates. You have new messages at Mrt3366's talk page.
Message added 12:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tito Dutta  (talk • contributions • email) 12:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Bibliography of Swami Vivekananda

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey Correct Knowledge. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Amitrochates. You have new messages at TParis's talk page.
Message added 20:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

v/r - TP 20:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gulmarg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Ultras of Eastern Himalayas

Hello. Regarding this edit. Agree of course that they are not by any stretch part of the Himalayas. The thing is, every one of the 1,515 ultra prominent peaks in the world was listed among the collection of ultras lists, but not now. So we should either put the peaks you have removed into another ultra list, or put them back where they were and rename the page to something that makes more sense. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 22:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

I have reverted my edit. We could rename it List of Ultras in India, but then we'd have to include other ultras within the geographical boundaries of India as well. For some reason prominence of peaks doesn't figure a great deal in references dealing with mountains in India. So it'll be a lot more work. :) Amitrochates (talk) 22:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, true. But we are really only talking about four peaks. The prominences of those four are sourced here. Could we just move List of Ultras of the Eastern Himalayas to List of Ultras of the Eastern Himalayas and southern India? --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 22:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Or maybe move the four peaks into the list List of Ultras of Tibet, East Asia and neighbouring areas, which is already sort of a catch-all anyway. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 22:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Moving the four peaks into List of Ultras of Tibet, East Asia and neighbouring areas makes more sense to me. Eastern Himalayas and Southern India are seldom grouped together without including the other ranges between them. Maybe someday those four peaks will make their way into a List of Ultras in India article. For now including them in Ultras of Tibet, East Asia and neighbouring areas seems to be the simple and elegant solution. Amitrochates (talk) 23:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Ok, sounds good. I wouldn't mind taking a stab a creating List of Ultras in India in the near future. Another problem I see though would be the large overlap with the Himalayan ultra lists, which could only be avoided by dividing the ultras up by country, and that would be work. I will think about it. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 23:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done, with our temporary solution. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 23:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

I prefer to list mountains by range than by country - especially in the Himalaya where borders are disputed. Viewfinder (talk) 11:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

We don't necessarily have to choose between them. Listing mountains by range and country can go on side by side. Besides, the information on where exactly the borders are is out there even if it is hard to find. In fact, many lists, such as this one (pdf), have already done a decent job of figuring that out. Amitrochates (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Ok, well then we could just create a page called List of most prominent mountain peaks of India where we would list, at minimum, all of India's ultras, plus however more we want of the next most prominence ranked peaks in India; or just only list India's ultras, much like the article List of most prominent mountain peaks of Alaska. I don't think we should tinker much more with the ultras lists. I like how, as a group, they accurately give a comprehensive list of all the world's ultras, without overlap.--RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 23:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

List of most prominent mountain peaks of India won't solve our problem. In fact, if listing the most prominent Indian peaks was the only issue here, we could just have added them as a separate section in List of mountains in India. The problem here is that the non-Himalayan Indian/Sri–Lankan peaks right now sit uncomfortably in List of Ultras of Tibet, East Asia and neighbouring areas. And I suspect there could be more ultras in South Asia (maybe Guru Shikhar for instance). Something like a List of non–Himalayan Ultras in South Asia would serve our purpose. It certainly wouldn't disturb or overlap with any of the existing lists. Of course, if there are only four non–Himalayan ultras in South Asia creating a separate article for them would be excessive. In that case, we might have to rename the Tibet list. Amitrochates (talk) 00:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right. I don't know what I was hoping to accomplish with that one. Indeed there seems to be no ideal fit for these four peaks.

And because they do not neatly fit, I think creating the separate ultra list article for them is a better idea than you give yourself credit for. We already have List of ultras of the Caribbean which contains only 7 peaks. I think it would be better than what we have now, and it wouldn't be much work at all. Title not bad, List of non–Himalayan Ultras in South Asia, but can it be improved? What do you think? --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 01:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Also, I forgot, there is overlap among the ultras lists: The Papua, Indonesia peaks on both List of Ultras of Malay Archipelago and List of Ultras of Oceania. So for the moment anyway, I drop my objection to creating overlap. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 01:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Nah, let's not create overlapping lists if we can help it. I can't think of a simpler title right now. Ideally, List of Ultras in South Asia would have been enough, but we have to add "non–Himalayan" to prevent an overlap. Amitrochates (talk) 01:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Agree. I pasted the basic contents into my sandbox here to see how it would look. You're free to use/add to/change any of it, if or when you would like to create the list (and I wouldn't mind creating it myself) but I suggest waiting to give VF and others a chance to weigh in before doing anything right now. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 02:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Champion Round 48

This user was the winner of Round 48 of the India Quiz.

You are the winner of round 48 of the India quiz along with Dwaipayan. Congratulations! --Suresh Purohit (Su_hit) (talk) 06:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the barnstar. Amitrochates (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

welcome

welcome Amitrochates!--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks and that was quick. :) Portal:India/Quiz#Q_54.15 is still waiting for you. Amitrochates (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Amitrochates. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 12:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Tito Dutta (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Replied Tito. Amitrochates (talk) 12:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks buddy

Dear Amitrochates. I want to appreciate role played by in WIPQ. The forum is witnessing new level of energy and knowledge. keep it going ! --Suresh Purohit (Su_hit) (talk) 04:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the appreciation Su_hit! It means a lot coming from the Quiz Master General. You keep the whole thing going, rest of us participate intermittently. Amitrochates (talk) 07:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Amitrochates. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Replied JJ, also awaiting a reply. Amitrochates (talk) 15:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Enthiran PR

Hi, I am Ssven2. I had recently taken this film article starring Rajinikanth and Aishwarya Rai to GA status and nominated it for FAC, but it was withdrwan due to WP:PUNC and MOS:LQ issues, most of which have been resolved. Do let me know if you are interested in leaving additional comments at the article's 2nd PR. Thanks. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 01:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dnyaneshwar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ovi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Dnyaneshwar

Interesting: "Shri Chakradhar Swami propagated a religious movement, as well as social movement, in which all members were accepted irrespective of their castes, and the traditional ritualistic religion was rejected." I'll read the Dnyaneshwar-article; thanks for your work there. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

You'll probably think I reminisce too much but this conversation happened more than two years ago. Yes, it's been that long since I thought of working on the article. Better late than never I guess. Amitrochates (talk) 06:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

O my, you've really got a good memory! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you ...for your contributions and interest for the Sant Dnyaneshwar page... Swapniladitya — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.222.228 (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the encouragement Swapniladitya. I'll get back to working on the article once I am free again. Regards. Amitrochates (talk) 00:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Sompura Brahmin needs knowledgeable editor

Sompura Brahmin is a fairly short article on a topic related to Shaivism that needs editing by someone knowledgeable on the subject. Please see Wikipedia talk:Hinduism-related topics notice board § Sompura Brahmin. Thanks. --Thnidu (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Amitrochates

Great username! Ogress _smash! 16:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Slayer of enemies is probably not the best of usernames to have in a collegial working environment like wp but thanks! :) Amitrochates (talk) 19:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Much Thanks

Thanks for your diligent work on the Samkhya page, and your ability to stay more even-tempered than I when rebuffing fringers.Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 07:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

2016 March Indian Collaboration of the Months

Hello,

We are happy to inform you that WikiProject Indian Collaborations of the month is going to be restarted this month and we want your active support here.

1. Please nominate an article or vote other nominations here. The process will continue till 10 March.
2. Should we introduce prizes for the best participants? If so, what should be the criteria, and what prizes should we give? Share your views here.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Amitrochates. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Amitrochates. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)