User talk:AlvaJr

Extended content

edit you just made

In your edit summary you indicated you were "moving out to the other one". I am guessing what you are trying to say is that you are already evading this block, which Was obvious anyway. It would be a more productive use of your time to try and address the actual issues that led to your being blocked in the first place. You have never tried to appeal this block, instead you keep editing under other identities and making things worse. Your apparent inability to understand that this is the wrong way to go about getting unblocked is indicative of the same mindset that got you blocked. Please stop evading the block and try to understand why it was necessary. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:59, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm retiring my user wikipedia post, but with comments and calm

Ladies and gentlemen, I've been the user since 2006 and I decided to retire for login to wikpedia site. I apologize for asking regarding question about things that doesn't have. When they cancelled the show, the programs, radio station changes, out of print DVD releases, blocking the video (country and worldwide) on YouTube, commercial reruns that doesn't have, buying TV network music that doesn't have, unsourced cartoon syndicated local station affiliates that wikipedia is not a TV guide or something like that, I don't need to ask for more because only the company has decided what to provide the users to see, give, changing and what they get of any kind of that. So I feel sorry for 98.7 Kiss FM merging to WBLS and ESPN taking over the FM dial and rename call letters WRKS to WEPN-FM, Hurricane Sandy, RXP to WFAN-FM sports, WXRK to WNOW-FM on Now 92.3, La Que Buena to Mami 92.7, WPAT-FM Spanish Top 40 to Musica Romantica (classics too), old 1999 to new Telemundo 2012 logo, old 1990 to new Univision 2013 logo and Telefutura to Unimas new name to gain Mexican-Colombian audience. So anyone can disactivated my account and thanks and a happy new year. AlvaJr (talk) 01:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Señora Música and Los Clásicos radio programming return to airwaves in NYC

Since my upset after 4-year hiatus not returning to radio programming, Señora Música with Douglas Peña and Los Clásicos with Coco Cabrera is back on it airwaves in NYC on January 6, 2013 and it will be on new WQBU-FM Mami 92.7 Sunday programming at 10AM-12PM (Señora Música) and 12-5PM (Los Clásicos) since it was before previously aired on WCAA 105.9 Latino Mix (now La Kalle until lasted on October 8, 2009 while changing the frequency to move to a new 96.3 with new X name and WQXR 96.3 (Classical) moved to 105.9). So thank you for bringing it back, so while my other user talk was blocked from editing for disruptive editing til' expiring on March 25, 2013. Have a nice day. AlvaJr (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlvaJr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.

If you have anything to say for yourself you may post here so that it can be copied over to the case page. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that I repeat somebody else said. At that time I wasn't clear on my mind. I apologize for everything for what I did. I would like to know that is possible to unblock my account wikipedia, thank you. AlvaJr (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not at all sure that it is going to be possible. For most people it is a relatively easy process, but in your case you don't even seem to understand what you did wrong, which is in fact part of the reason I felt it necessary to block you in the first place. However, you are welcome to formally appeal the block. You removed the original block notice that had instructions on how to do that, for your convenience I am re-adding it below. Please note that any request you make will also need to address the block evasion you engaged in after being blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for gross incompetence and block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:44, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlvaJr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So once again, my apology for my disruption editing, socking or evading my block for what I did wrong and I know that I'm sorry for asking things that doesn't have or making non-sense that I shouldn't do that. So would you like to unblock my account that I won't happen again and I respect that. AlvaJr (talk) 01:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I feel that your command of the English language is inadequate to allow you to make meaningful contributions here.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, my answer is still going to be no. I do not believe you are sufficiently competent to be a productive contributor. For example, despite having it repeatedly explained to you how to properly appeal this block you still have not used the unblock template. This is suggested so that you can be assured of a review by an admin other than the one that issued the block. As such I have gone ahead and placed your latest comments inside an unblock request so that another admin may review it, but I have to tell you that it is so poorly written that it strongly suggests that in addition to your other issues you do not have a sufficient understanding of the English language to make any sort of positive contributions here. You might want to consider contributing in your native language, assuming that is indeed what the issue is here. It's difficult to particpate in a project when you don't speak the language it is conducted in. See List of Wikipedias for more information on different language projects. You may also alter the rerasoning in the current request or replace it with a new one as you see fit. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then, can you revoke my own talk page to ban my user account beacuse I don't feel like unnessesary to create or editing over here because it's not mine and that's yours and I'm retiring, and I know that was my problem. But my problem is when they blocked the video on YouTube like UMG, WMG, Warner Chappell or other music or TV Series or Movie like Lionsgate (including TMNT, Rambo (Carloco), ALF Animation (DIC), Civil Brand or something like that, I listen different music or I watch different programs and not to worry for the things that they don't have or when radio station changes (like NYC), I don't have to be upset or obessesed with that and I listen to another station like 93.1 Amor, ESPN 98.7, 107.5 WBLS or things like that. So are you ready to agree with 100% to revoke my own talk page to ban my user Beeblebrox, Yes or No? AlvaJr (talk) 19:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that is a bunch of gibberish, which is not surprising. I think you are asking me to revoke your ability to edit this talk page, which i am more than happy to do since I see no point in continuing this discussion. If you wish to appeal this block in the future you may contact WP:BASC by email or use the WP:UTRS system. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so apparently I mis-clicked before and failed to actually revoke your talk page. Another admin has rectified that error. I'm sorry that you hate me so much, I don't see myself as your enemy, I think if you look back you would see that I tried to help you avoid this happening, but you have been your own worst enemy here and there was nothing I could do to stop your disruption other than blocking you.

And the incredible temper tantrum you just threw here pretty much guarantees that any further appeal you may wish to make over the next year or so would be declined, so once again you have acted against your own interest and made things worse, but hopefully now you will simply stay away from Wikipedia. It is abundantly clear that this is not a proper environment for you, so it would be in your best interest to just forget you ever edited here and move on to something more in line with your own personal abilities and temperament.

Best of luck in your future endeavors, I sincerely hope this is the last time we will cross paths here. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]