User talk:Alikaalex
|
Wording choice in Orange Line article
[edit]Hi AlikaAlex. I see you prefer the shorter wording of the cost of the BRT system. I wanted to discuss this. I guess you think the Orange Line isn't a substitute for rail and the line's length doesn't need to be repeated.
Transit planners originally wanted light rail along the right-of-way, an extention of the Red Line, but local objected, as the article discusses. So it was a substitute.
- I think the original intent was to extend the Red Line, which is heavy rail. Light rail was considered after heavy rail ceased to be an option, so I would argue that the Orange Line is no more a substitute for light rail than it is for heavy rail. Since the article goes into depth about the other transit modes considered prior to BRT, I would argue the point has been more than adequately discussed and needs not be restated. --Alika 08:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
The length of the line was only in the infobox, and important information on a topic belongs in the article body, not just in an infobox.
- Actually, I believe you're mistaken. The third sentence of the article states the length of the line. I agree that it doesn't hurt to mention it in the infobox as well, but one mention in the first paragraph of the article (a position of great importance) along with the infobox mention is sufficient to remind readers of the length of the line. --Alika 08:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Why in that place in the article? Because the cost of the system (especially cost vs. light rail) is a significant topic of the article, and it makes sense to put the length of the line next to its cost so readers can see how much it costs for how much transit they got.
- I would support a more complete analysis of the costs per mile of heavy rail vs. light rail vs. busway, but I don't think a single sentence can do that argument justice. That's why I think the sentence should be pared down into a simple statement of cost. If you want to insert a complete analysis, I'd suggest adding a dedicated section of the article. –-Alika 08:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Lastly, I just think it the text reads better, if I might complement my own writing, which is usually at Wikipedia's boring standard :-).
- I just feel your word choice reads more as commentary than statement of fact. The "substitute" wording really seems to convey the idea that BRT is inferior to light rail (which, again, was not the only rail option considered for this route). As a rail supporter, I happen to agree that rail transit is superior to bus transit, but implying that in the article strays from Wikipedia's goal of being neutral and unbiased. --Alika 08:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Anyway, what are your thoughts? Thanks! Diderot's dreams (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hope the above more completely states my wording concerns. Thanks for the interesting discussion! :-) --Alika 08:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. The Orange Line was a substitute, not just light rail, technically, as you point out, as a subway is usually heavy rail, but for more expensive rail alternatives. Now it is very clear from the preceeding paragraphs in the article that's what it is, and so it isn't neccessary to repeat it. My purpose was stylistic, to have a different noun for the Orange Line. I see how you might see it as an attempt at POV. And you are right about the length of the line in being in the lead. It isn't really the length of line that is the relevant information anyway, but the cost per mile. This is a straight forward fact, and if more information is warranted, then it can be added, but factually accurate information shouldn't be removed because it is incomplete.
- So I suggest changing the text from this:
- Construction began in September 2002 and the line opened three years later, on October 29, 2005, and cost $324 million.
- to this:
- Construction began in September 2002 and the line opened three years later, on October 29, 2005. The bus rapid transit line cost $324 million ($23 million per mile).
- Would that work for you? Diderot's dreams (talk) 03:34, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry for the lengthy delay in this reply. The holidays and several nasty back-to-back colds have basically sidelined me for the past month or so. :-( Anyway, I like your revised text! I think it works well in the article. Thanks for the thoughtful discussion. --Alika 02:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think I've already been doing this, but thanks for the reminder, Mr. SineBot! :-) --AlikaAlex 21:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
| The minor copy edits you made at Santa Monica Air Line (Pacific Electric) show you are not afraid of doing small tasks to make the encyclopedia better. GeorgeLouis (talk) 03:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
- I've never seen one of these before. Many thanks! :-) AlikaAlex 18:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Another barnstar for you
[edit]|
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
You should get one more barnstar for your recent efforts to cleanup the Higher-speed rail page. I know you are not done with it yet, but I feel like you already deserve this after cleaning up half of that page.  Z22 (talk) 04:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
|
Allow me to offer you a big, belated "thank you"! AlikaAlex 22:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FlyAway (bus), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 405. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Los Angeles bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Nelson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Alikaalex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alikaalex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Signature
[edit]Hello! Per WP:SIGLINK, please include a link to your userpage, talk page, or contribs in your customized signature. Thank you! Killiondude (talk) 00:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alikaalex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alikaalex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Problem with your custom signature
[edit]You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
- Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
- Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.
More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 05:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |