User talk:Alexnews

Welcome!

Hello, Alexnews, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Ranvir Sena does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Neelkamala (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bhumihar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bhumihar was changed by Alexnews (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864806 on 2014-06-25T08:26:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bhumihar with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:MelbourneStar with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 08:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HI PLEASE UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH DIRTY INFORMATION IS GIVEN IN THIS ARTICLE LIKE DIRTY TALES REGARDING BHUMIHAR AND AS A PROPOGANDA POSTIVE THINGS AND VALID THINGS ARE DELETED FROM BHUMIHAR PAGE ,SO UNDERSTNAD IT

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bhumihar with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 08:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANY one not understand my point of view.on page of bhumihar some people write negative things on behalf of tales that bhumihar are derived from rajput men and brahmin women all these nonsense things hurt a bhumihar.all real postive good information are deleted by a propoganda. a gentle and good wikipedia editor can judge it by see history of page bhumihar.negative things which attack on a caste community and society should be deleted.please understand my concern and unblock me and also see history of page bhumihar edits made by different editors

thank all of you

Talkback

Hello, Alexnews. You have new messages at MelbourneStar's talk page.
Message added 09:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I recognise you've temporarily lost your editing privileges, but should you return after they've been regained - I have left you a reply to your message on my talk page. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANY one not understand my point of view.on page of bhumihar some people write negative things on behalf of tales that bhumihar are derived from rajput men and brahmin women all these nonsense things hurt a bhumihar.all real postive good information are deleted by a propoganda. a gentle and good wikipedia editor can judge it by see history of page bhumihar.negative things which attack on a caste community and society should be deleted.please understand my concern and unblock me thank all of you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexnews (talk • contribs)

Hello. You may want to read about Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Editors are not supposed to introduce their own point of view into artices. Changes that are backed up by reliable sources and are neutral in nature are acceptable and encouraged. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 09:28, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello could you delete "bhumihar are offspring of a union between Rajput men and Brahmin women" these things are nonsense and dirty please try understand few people want to create negative image of bhumihars they delete all postive information even those have good refence. you have blocked me it's ok. but could you delete this nonsense "bhumihar are offspring of a union between Rajput men and Brahmin women" written by a dirty minded people

Chillum delete this "bhumihar are offspring of a union between Rajput men and Brahmin women" written by a dirty minded people — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexnews (talk • contribs)

I do not know enough about the subject to edit that article. I am willing to remove the block from your account if you agree to go to the talk page and start a discussion about the edit instead of changing the page repeatedly. If you can gather a consensus that the article should be changed, or demonstrate that the claim lacks a reliable source then it can be removed. You will also be expected to remain civil with the other editors.

If this sounds reasonable to you let me know and I will lift the block. Also please sign your posts by putting ~~~~. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 09:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chillum i have not permission to edit on your talk page.so please unblock me.if you want not to unblock me then at least delete the dirty tales of rajput men and brahmin men.

Chillum please unblock me

please unblock me i am agree with you i will edit with patience.please now unblock me thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexnews (talk • contribs)

I have unblocked you on the promise that you will not be hostile to others and that you will seek consensus before making controversial changes. If you repeat your prior behavior another admin or I will block you again.

Some of your editing patterns are very similar to those of an already blocked editor. If it is though that you are a returning blocked user then you will be blocked indefinitely. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Chillum i will only change rajput men and brahmin women part it is like an abuse for a bhumihar brahmin.thanks for unblocking me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexnews (talk • contribs)

Wow, you were unblocked and straight away you went and did this? Please take heed of the notice below. - Sitush (talk) 17:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

I offered the unblock on the condition that you would discuss controversial edits instead of repeatedly making them. I have reinstated and lengthened the block. You also appear to possibly be a returning blocked user, if this is so then another admin may block you indefinitely. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 18:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi Chillum i have only deleted the abusive part "bhumihars are offspring of rajput men and brahmin women" i feel you people understand at least this.it is unfair my good edits are removed by sitush and you donot take action against him and banning me.please please their are so many abuse but i delete only those which are cannot be tolerated.these things hurt the sentimenat of a bhumihar brahmin it is a insult for him and his anscestor.unjustice and unfair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexnews (talk • contribs)

If you think my block was unfair you can ask that another admin review it by putting {{unblock|reason}} on your talk page. However I find it unlikely that another admin will think you should be unblocked. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 18:18, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i think now i can't do anything.because all of you don't have a good heart.i am dissapointed and lost.now i think i can't do anything.you all are one to guard the abuse editings with full caliber.what i can do?