User talk:Aardwolf Nirvana

Welcome!

Hello, Aardwolf Nirvana! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 10:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Aardwolf Nirvana, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Aardwolf Nirvana!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

See also section revisions

This concerns edits to see also sections involving myself. If you have a problem, please converse here!

Is AF447 really irrelevant?

hi. I note that you deprecated the relevance of AF447 to 8501. The pitot tube failure was only the initial cause. The main cause was the failure of the PF (inexperienced first officer) to push the nose down and keep it down until the stall warning disappeared while the nose was down. i.e pilot error. The recent radar data suggest to me that the same pilot error could have occurred when 8501 was wafted by a huge updraft, which increases the angle of attack beyond stall, requiring immediate nose down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Layzeeboi (talk • contribs) 00:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I agree that Pulkovo 612 is relevant; I didn't notice that. Now I ask about your statement "If the crash was caused by engine failure we would know by now". How would we necessarily know? From the FDR data? I am skeptical about the investigative efficiency of the NTSC, and the transparency of the Ministry of Transport. Layzeeboi (talk) 02:12, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by "conventional stall" in the context of violent thunderstorms. What would an "unconventional stall" be? Certainly the weather was a contributing factor to what happened, including any stall. We have yet to see an opinion from a person competent in aerodynamics with access to all of the data. A flameout due to hail can combine with a strong updraft to contribute to a stall. In fact, flameout may be one of the common causes of stalls. Such accidents as this one are typically due to a confluence of several contributing factors. Layzeeboi (talk) 17:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)