User talk:89.28.184.63

November 2012

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 1984 in the United Kingdom because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 12:08, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hugo Ellis was changed by 89.28.184.63 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854457 on 2013-02-28T12:39:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Vigilante

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Vigilante added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! Epicgenius (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Good catch! Thanks, Quis separabit? 15:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Liquorice and Gherkin Sandwich concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Liquorice and Gherkin Sandwich, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Thorpe Bay seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thorpe Bay, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 13:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thorpe Bay, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 13:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thorpe Bay. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:13, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might think that Thorpe Bay is where all the toffs and posh people in Southend hang out, and that's it's bloody expensive, but as they are considered part of the town, they have a valid place in the article. (And my kids love the Adventure Island by the pier). Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Thorpe Bay— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Avoided (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mein Kampf. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 11:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wi-Fi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wi-Fi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 16:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nostradamus, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Thorpe Bay, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ian Cox. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 14:48, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Horsham. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Charles (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Bambos Charalambous. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Croydon, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nat King Cole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Thegreatluigi (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.