User talk:78.148.155.84

December 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Emlythk (talk) 20:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Traffic collision. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 20:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Traffic collision shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are edit-warring over this odd issue. Please ask the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE for help. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to Traffic Collision

I noticed you were of the opinion that a clarification of visual aids should be added to the page. Rather than edit warring as you were, I propose you state your side on the talk page. I have created a thread on the talk page for such purpose. I believe that people would be much more receptive to it if there was more explanation as to the necessity of the addition. It is available at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk%3ATraffic_collision#<span_id="Epidemiology_visual_aid.27s_clarity"_typeof="mw:FallbackId">Epidemiology_visual_aid's_clarity

Happy editing! Emlythk (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.