Your recent edit to the page Universal Century appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --Chris(talk)02:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on G-Saviour. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Farix (Talk) 00:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
The duration of the block is 2 * 7 * 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question.
Hello old fruit. Your talk page is a mass of warnings and your block log is impressive for one so new. But you must have noticed that your strategy of revert-but-don't-talk and ignore-WP:3RR simply doesn't work. So, you need a new strategy. If that is going to be leave-wikipedia, so be it. Otherwise, I suggest you read the rules, abide by them, and begin to discuss William M. Connolley (talk) 09:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Chouriki Sentai Ohranger. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Merlion44413:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have made several inaccurate and/or badly formatted edits to various Dune-related articles; please do not add unsourced information, remove content, or make other disruptive edits. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk02:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Lasgun, you will be blocked from editing. — TAnthonyTalk02:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The League of Nobles is a term invented for the recent prequels, and should not be mixed in which discussion of Frank Herbert's original works unless it is specifically noted as such. The area of List of Dune planets you persist in changing is specifically referenced to Herbert's works. Further, the Landsraad article explains, with sources, how that governing body was at some point called the "Landsraad League" (accoding to Frank Herbert) and even notes later in the article the term "Leangue of Nobles" as related to the prequels not written by Frank Herbert.
Further, you changing in this and other articles "13,300 worlds under Landsraad influence immediately after the Butlerian Jihad" to "13,300 worlds under Landsraad influence immediately before the Butlerian Jihad" is problematic. While you might argue that these would be interchangeable because this number would presumably be the same immediately before or immediately after, the source is specifically citing numbers based on deaths from a post-Jihad perspective.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy9621:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Emperor Gaozu of Han with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Free_Bear (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:One Year War are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 22:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at One Year War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your referencing are all non-existent and continued to disrupt Wikipedia with the same self-claimed info without ANY actual official sources. If you are going to reference a video on youtube about an official show, at least give a link or an episode number, so others can verify it, but since you NEVER do that and was rebuked by multiple official sources, we all know you are just lying. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk01:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dirge (novel) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — JeffG. ツ03:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to World War III (G.I. Joe), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.