User talk:49.43.43.99

September 2024

You were blocked on your original IP address more than two weeks ago. This means you are not allowed to edit using other IP addresses or accounts, and if you do, any edit you make may be reverted immediately without explanation by any user. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original IP? What are you talking about? You're the one who is constantly deleting the sourced articles. 49.43.43.99 (talk) 12:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been editing under multiple IP addresses. The one you first used was 2402:8100:2738:B09C:C9F8:F37E:C98F:3CC1 (talk · contribs). You were blocked there for a period of one month on 28 August, which you'll see a record of if you click on the "contribs" link up there. Every subsequent edit you have made is therefore an instance of block evasion. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lol Don't you have any other work to do? Instead of blaming others look at your actions first. Clearly, you're not here for contribution but for different agendas. Do you work for someone or you hv been paid to work for them? 49.43.43.99 (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that when it becomes clear you are in fact in violation of Wikipedia policy you switch to personal attacks - which were part of the reason you were blocked in the first place. If you look at my Wikipedia contributions, you will see literally tens of thousands of them completely unrelated to my commitment to policy enforcement on this issue.

I would stop bothering to come back and violate the block if I were you - your edits will simply keep getting undone and the IP addresses you use will be blocked. If, when your block is expired, you wish to come back and find an actual consensus-based, constructive path forward (free from personal attacks) for the articles in question, I would look forward to that discussion. But you can't do that while you're blocked. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not here to hear your blah blah blah. I'm here to contribute. Please excuse me and let me do my work. You have no authority or you're neither in the position to tell me what should I do or not. 49.43.43.99 (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will not let you do your work. You are evading a block. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other IPs that you have used which have subsequently been blocked include 2402:8100:3863:7729:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs), 2402:8100:385B:AD72:68E4:FD6A:458E:F394 (talk · contribs) and 2402:8100:3863:7729:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs). This IP will likely be blocked soon too. You keep saying "someone block this user" [i.e. me] but the fact that you are the subject of some four separate blocks should tell you something. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mind your own work. 49.43.43.99 (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lol instead of telling others to follow the guidelines of Wikipedia. Why don't you start that with yourself? You're the one who is constantly desrupting the editings, vandalising and engaging in edit warring. 49.43.43.99 (talk) 12:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

49.43.43.99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I'm not the one who is disrupting the editing. I added the source to support my statement but the other guy is constantly reverting my edits because he has some personal problem with him. He is vandalising the article without giving any reason. I'm just here to contribute and he is not letting me to do any edits. Whatever I'm editing here no matter what he is constantly undoing this. This is clearly a personal attack on me by this user

Decline reason:

If I was to unblock you, I strongly feel that you would continue in your disruptive editing. I suggest you read WP:CONSENSUS before posting another unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

49.43.43.99 (talk) 12:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.