User talk:129.6.190.21

Welcome!

Hello, 129.6.190.21! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 18:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 129.6.190.21, is registered to National Institute of Standards and Technology and may be shared by multiple users of a government agency or facility, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation.

Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions.

Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

June 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Erdős–Bacon number, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Willie Aames. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amaury (talk) 20:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read his page history - HE removed embarrassing info from his own page.

Your comment is absurd. There is no evidence that Aames edited the page. And even if he did, that doesn't give you the right to violate Wikipedia policies about living people. The warning stands. Continue this behavior and you will be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 20:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment is incredibly naive. Look at the posting history of 208.114.124.199. It includes cleaning his page of this embarrassing piece of his employment history, commenting on cruise ships on which he's been cruise director, and posting that he married "his soul mate". Are you for real that you are that blind?129.6.190.21 (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most things on this guy's page are unreferenced. Why aren't you clearing these things out? Why was the BibleMan info allowable for a year when it was posted in the exact same format that I restored? 129.6.190.21 (talk) 15:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

See http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Due_and_undue_weight

Gates' salary is publicly available, and well sourced, but so are salaries of nearly all public school faculty. Gates is not the highest, nor is he rare in that he teaches little. There are no articles discussing Gates' salary as significant in any way. Nor are there any that suggest his teaching commitment is significant. Such conclusions are your own.

When you accuse my reversion of your edits to be based on opinion alone, the reverse is true. You personally feel his compensation package, which was agreed to by him and his employer, are unfair or excessive, and you personally feel he teaches too little. Unless you can cite a source that suggests either of these things, there is no reason to include his salary and teaching commitments in the Wikipedia article. You provide no rationale for why his salary is significant, nor do I see you editing the pages of other professors with high salaries to include said information. Kenton M (talk) 01:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi

I recently did an article for Ernest Ambler but don't have his date of death. If you (or someone at NIST) is able to, would you mind please updating it with one? Thank you! DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Tonka

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tonka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Morphdog^flames 19:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to NIST

I haven't mentioned anywhere that NIST sets standards, I simply mentioned that it "prescribes" standards, as I'm well aware that NIST is a non-regulatory agency. Also, the other changes I included were to mention the joint institutes NIST has with Stanford, CU Boulder and UMD, and also added more research areas to the ones present now as I personally think the present list is not exhaustive. Another was to change the name of the current director. And for almost everything, I included the relevant source(s). Let me know which of these you consider as spam or vandalism. Be specific in the responses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.6.39.91 (talk) 18:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Also, I edited the intro to focus on the fact that NIST is just not a measurement standards laboratory, it is much more than that and it is better to refer it as a physical sciences laboratory with specialization in developing measurement standards. Check the intro here from DOC https://www.commerce.gov/doc/national-institute-standards-and-technology#5/37.546/-91.103(The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is one of the Nation’s oldest physical science laboratories. At NIST world class science connects to real-world applications.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.6.39.91 (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly sounds like you have an agenda, and probably even a WP:Conflict of interest. Phrases like "At NIST world class science connects to real-world applications" have no place on an encyclopedia. Please take your specific issues with the page to the Talk page of that article for them to be addressed there. Also, please take the time to read the many links just placed on your Talk page to review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, in particular the Manual of Style (MOS) and how to present information neutrally. Also, remember to sign your Talk page contributions with four tildes (~~~~). JesseRafe (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.