Jump to content

User talk:107.123.37.79

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Lenny Marks. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kay Granger without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In addition to adding content, you removed content with citations to sources. Lenny Marks (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake and apologies. I made an edit request to fix my error by restoration of the grandchildren and church about info. See talk. 🙂 107.123.37.79 (talk) 18:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Content dispute on Kay Granger

[edit]

hi, I noticed you and other editors appear to be involved in a content dispute at Kay Granger. Wikipedia has strict policies about edit wars. I would advise you to continue the debate at the discussion on the article's talk page rather than going back and forth editing the article. If you have any questions feel free to reach out. Thanks and happy editing :) Lenny Marks (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, your edit summary for this edit, which broadly diagnosed both a specific individual and politicians at large with mental illness, is a violation of our biographies of living people policy and has been removed. Please do not make such comments in edit summaries again. signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the mental illness edit was NOT my edit, and such a comment SHOULD be reverted. I'm an unregistered editor, but please look at both my ip address and that of the one making the derogatory "mental" comment. It was not my edit. One a related note -- and as I said elsewhere -- THE GUARDIAN and MSN are certainly not "in the bag" for Republicans or otherwise biased. See my semi-protected edit request for clarification. Thank you both for your assistance here. 107.123.37.79 (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]