User talk:Христо Зарев Игнатов

==Cleared for no ue of the first two items to stay here"

Two items were removed, as long as they comprise already closed and non-in-future-use, discussions. --Христо Зарев Игнатов (talk) 22:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All noted a long ago! - Sorry that was a "technical" error of my first-steps Wiki-times.. ;)

--Христо Зарев Игнатов (talk) 20:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Arts

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Arts, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://vfu.bg/en/news/vfu_lecturer_acknowledged_by_the_bulgarian_academy_of_sciences_and_arts/index.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All noted. Will revert asap. Thanks! --Христо Зарев Игнатов (talk) 20:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Ogress. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Khan (title) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Removal of content because WP:I just don't like it is against Wikipedia policy. Those were heavily-cited and even linked to the Bulgarian Wikipedia article on Bulgarian Khans. Ogress _smash! 23:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

The point is that there is a real "war" over the history. Especially that concerns some very old nations as is the Bulgarian. There are some very difficult to explain persons or societies, that very much insist on a very., very wrong historical point. A prominent example for that "war" is the falsification of the times of oldest Bulgarian history 1500 B.C. - 850 A.D. A part of it is the lie to call the old Bulgarians or their ancestors either "bulgar" (that is very different by etymology and meaning) or "Turks" - that is simply more than wrong. So - there are many alviable sources to find the titles warn by the old Bulgarian rulers - Tsar, Knyaz, Archont, Rex, Emperor... There were never a "han" or "khan".... The last too are famous to be Asian - Near or Far-east people titles. As long as, the old Bulgarians were Aryan nation. If you personally like to know the true - there are evidences all around. If you need me to show you - I will, but it needs some little time and patience. Good day! --Христо Зарев Игнатов (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kardam of Bulgaria and Tervel of Bulgaria

Hello, I explained the reasons for reverting your edits on each talk page. Once more, be aware that you will be reported if you continue edit warring and you may be banned from further editing.

You are allowed to have your own personal (albeit alternative) point of view on Bulgarian history, but please be aware that Wikipedia aims to be neutral and it is not a suitable place for such fringe theories. — Toдor Boжinov — 16:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Edit warring and misuse of logged-out editing, as you did at Kardam of Bulgaria. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Darkwind (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Христо Зарев Игнатов (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There should be some mystake. 1st it is about one very famous fact of Bulgarian history, which was removet several times by the a greek-languaged user, who asket Todor Bozhinov to block me. Another point is that there are other editors, who also manifested the point I followed. Why s'one should be blocked for this? Христо Зарев Игнатов (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for edit warring, not for the contents of your edits. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry, I have no idea of making "edit warning"-s? So, I do not remember to have done one. --Христо Зарев Игнатов (talk) 08:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Malamir of Bulgaria‎, you may be blocked from editing. Constantine ✍ 20:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cplakidas! - Please, before you to stand and rise a claim against, someone, show us why you thing you are right?!

For example: Several editors, had posted several studies over the matter. Why this studies, can not stay on the pages together with the relevent conclusions?! Thanks in advance for your prompt answer! - Kalinighta! --Христо Зарев Игнатов (talk) 21:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because these "studies" are not WP:RS and their "conclusions" are hopelessly biased. Your references are websites aiming to promote a specific reinterpretation of history, not neutral, scholarly research. The Turkic origin of the Bulgars, who mingled with the Slavs and the native Balkan population to produce the Bulgarian nation, is beyond doubt. If you want to ignore that and believe otherwise, that is your right. Introducing WP:FRINGE views in Wikipedia, however, is not. Constantine ✍ 21:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How pity is for us to read you simplified comprehension over the history, as far as over the Knowledge itself!

In fact... it is your point, far beyond any neutral point. However there is only one "neutral" point - the true one. It is a simple step to go for it. - Wish you to come in ti soon! Good night and please, stop to call bad names for the people, who had spend tenth of years for studying the matters you are hopelessly comment here... :( --Христо Зарев Игнатов (talk) 22:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for continued disruptive editing and edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- I fully agree with Hristo. So,

please stop imposing of unnecessary repressions over the subject! http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Asparukh_of_Bulgaria

It is better if you really start a discussion. --212.5.158.188 (talk) 07:33, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bgwhite (talk) 08:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've extended the block for one week. You are using IP addresses to continue editing the articles and leaving disruptive talk messages on user's pages. Use of IP addresses while blocked is sock puppetry. An indefinite ban is usually the result of sock puppetry. Any further use of IPs while being blocked will result in you being indefinitely banned. Bgwhite (talk) 08:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bgwhite (talk) 23:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now an inef block. You have been evading the block by use of an IP (Special:Contributions/176.12.58.89) and doing your disruptive editing. Bgwhite (talk) 23:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Editor is still reverting and causing disruption as 212.5.158.177 and 213.91.244.2 Bgwhite (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note 213.91.244.2 is back Bgwhite (talk) 00:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note 176.12.58.89 is back Bgwhite (talk) 19:54, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bgwhite Seems our friend is back, using two IPs: 212.5.158.165 and 212.5.158.191. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Laszlo Panaflex Both blocked. Bgwhite (talk) 17:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]