User:whirl editing
Also known as Edito*Magica. user talk: Edito*Magica .
A bit about this user
[edit]Whirl editing is an experienced and trusted user who has been editing since July 13th 2007; however up until January 24th 2009, editing was done under his other user name: 'Edito*Magica'. 'Edito*Magica' was wrongly blocked from wikipedia after being accused of vandalism, and so whirl editing is continuing where he left off, and taking articles to new, dizzy heights of quality! (appologies for the awful play on words).
You can leave a comment for Whirl editing or Edito*Magica in the Whirl pool below!
Wiki ads!
[edit] | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #221 |
The whirl pool (comment here!)
[edit]Topic: One Foot in the Grave article
[edit]- Hi,
What do think about moving the character descriptions to a new page?...there is already character description in the plot section, and i think the character section does make the page a little too long? Tell me what you think. Thanks.Whirl*editing (talk) 14:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, I think we discussed this before when you were Edito*Magica, but I still think it's a bad idea - the page needs character descriptions to make it comprehensive for readers. By comparison to some articles, the page isn't very long at all, and it's not justified to have a separate page for what are essentially six major characters. There aren't that many minor recurring characters, either, so it wouldn't even be justified as an extended page. In my experience, individual character pages tend to be rather poor quality, and if you look at Wikipedia article traffic statistics, spin-off pages are rarely viewed. Bob talk 15:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Additionally, articles about fiction should be discussed in a real-world context. The lists you have been creating do not conform to that guideline and are at risk of being deleted. The JPStalk to me 16:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok fair enough. People not visiting spin-off pages has always been a concern of mine, and i will begin tidying the character descriptions up soon. Thanks.Whirl*editing (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Requesting review of your block from ArbCom
[edit]Click this link: WP:ARBCOM. There are 16 active arbitrators listed on that page. Pick one with a friendly sounding name. Email them, and ask them to review your case. You may also want to read Wikipedia:Appealing a block#Appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Peace out. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 22:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)