User:SemperBlotto/Talk2010
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello SemperBlotto! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 736 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Perry Fenwick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Tag removed. Jeff Knaggs (talk) 11:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:GB Stamp Booklet 1968.jpg
[edit]I tagged File:GB Stamp Booklet 1968.jpgfor deletion because it has no fair-use rationale for a long time and it was only use din one article where I have replaced this non-free image with a freely licenced image. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 16:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:GB World Cup Overprint Stamp.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GB World Cup Overprint Stamp.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Cudighi
[edit]Thank for yor remark on the origin of the word. Living there I can confirm you that the word codeghi(n)/Cudeghi(n) and therefore also cudeghì (in Bergamo with accent on the last "i") is always used in northern Italian dialects, ciao --Massimo Macconi (talk) 07:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)