Jump to content

User:Littleteddy/Standards

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have decided that I will develop some RfA standards similar to Useight's when !voting in RfAs. When I oppose RfAs I could say 'Sorry, fails my standard: Number of Edits'.

Number of edits

[edit]
  • 1000 Mainspace edits

or

  • 500 Mainspace edits

and

  • 500 Project space edits
  • Evidence of contact with other users (e.g. high use of user talk or talk pages)
  • Good (80%+) use of edit summaries
  • Over 3000 edits

Activity

[edit]
  • At least 4 months of active contribution

or

  • 6000+ edits

and

  • At least 3 months of active contribution

Conduct

[edit]
  • Has not been warned for non-vandalism edits in the last 4 months
  • No (non-accidental) vandalism in the last 6 months
  • No blocks in the past year

or

  • No blocks since becoming an editor (where an editor has been here for less than a year)

I don't care if...

[edit]

But I do care if...

[edit]
  • The nominee answers only a few of the optional questions
  • The nominee has only been fighting vandalism rather than being an 'all-rounder'
  • The nominee is not a member of any WikiProjects
  • I feel that I should apply Ignore All Rules in supporting/opposing a nominee