I have no newspapers, magazines, or literary journals that i could scource this with. Should I take the whole thing about him winning this award out? would that help at all? Crowz RSA (talk) 20:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Hope I didn't step on your toes there with a speedy deletion, but I didn't see any assertion of notability per WP:WEB. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
That's fine, too. I'm not going to shed any tears for it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Can I not make a page of an Indian-origin kid band which is really doing very good in Vadodara in India. Please let me make this page Bakshitanay (talk) 16:48, 17 August 2009 (IST)
I deleted your article because I thought it was about a subject that didn't meet the notability criteria, but I'm open to the possibility that I was wrong. If you'll provide me with links to three articles that confirm this subject's notability, in newspapers, magazines, or significant online sources, I'd be happy to undelete the article, and I'll even add the sources to it so no one else will mistake it for an inappropriate article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
...for your prompt response at AN/EW. Despite that I initiated the action, it appears that User:Noloop can make useful contributions, but his good sense apparently gets overridden by passion at times, and he's still not quite clear on how policies apply. Is this the kind of situation where a mentor might be deemed useful? If so, where would be the proper place to suggest that, his talkpage, or an official forum? Thanks again Doc Tropics 23:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. A user you have blocked is involved in an arbitration case. Would you be able to comment here as to whether you think Noloop should be unblocked to participate in the case? Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 19:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
This article was deleted per a deletion discussion. Can you please delete it again?— DædαlusContribs 21:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Since another admin has already declined the repost tag, I think I'd feel better about letting the AfD continue for a little while first- it would be rude to undo another admin's actions. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I understand you have revoked this user access to his talk page following an denied unblock request. He is now editing additional requests through multiple sockpuppet IP addresses. Maybe it's time to protect the talk page completely? -- GameShowKid – talk – evidence 01:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
How was that not constructive. it was good information wasnt it? but correct me if I'm wrong and i'm very very very very very sorry if I did anything wrong, please don't ban me!! :(
A youtube fan video is not notable, and does not add any information about the subject that would be useful for an encyclopedia. Don't worry, I'm not going to block you right now. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
o.k. thank you very very much for not blocking me!!! I will look at some more of the rules and I'll try not to do anything bad anymore. I'm sorry, again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcdfan678 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
You'll have to delete that template again; looks like you deleted it while I was filing a TfD! --Dylan620 (contribs, logs)help us! 02:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't even know who that user IS... I just declined one of his requests for unblock once, and seem to keep encountering his sockpuppets. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for passing by. Maybe I should reveal that I am an autodidact on Wikipedia. If I am going in the wrong direction, I'dd appreciate if you 'd let me know. That is, if it is not too much trouble. Ida Shaw (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
We're all autodidacts here, so welcome to the club. Your edits looked useful and helpful to me... WP:HELP has lots of information (one might say, too much) about useful things to do as well. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
I have to tell you, I was blown away when that user came down on me for trying to protect him from himself. Thank you SO much for stepping in to try and explain things (not that it did any good from his standpoint). You're truly one of the good ones. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
He's thirteen. It is not useful to reason with him like an adult, because he is not able to reason like an adult. :) -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleting it so that only admins can see it is the best we can do - short of Oversight, of course. I do wonder if you've discouraged the editor concerned from spreading his personal information Web-wide on sites that are more carefree than WP with what thay allow people to reveal about themselves! TonywaltonTalk 23:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
I was scary on purpose- he needs to be more careful about that, not just at Wikipedia, but all over the web. Yeah, I know about oversight, but I didn't want to confuse him any further... -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm. Time for an unregistered bot which scans new users' userpages for credit card numbers, I think. However better he learns from a scary, dangerous WP admin than some Freddy Kruger type in a dark alley. TonywaltonTalk 23:59, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
To refactor another editors talk page? [[1]] I have left a lvl 1 warning on this page for refactoring another users talk page that was clarly not vandalism. I have since been told that because I have a colorful history it is an invalid warning. I would like to have a few admin go and comment one way or another to this as I believe my actions were not only appropriate but very moderated. Thank You.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 09:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment on the situation if you wish, however the prevailing opinion has been if you make 60,000 edits it's ok to discount others polite opinion because "they have bit a newbie (once) and have poor grammer." This wasn't a personal issue but a disturbing attitude trend.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 11:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
As far as I can tell: You tagged an inappropriate article for deletion, and warned the user, which was fine. Deb decided to just make the article into a userpage, since the author seemed to be trying to make a personal profile, and removed the warning from the talk page. This was the point at which you both should have talked politely to each other about what was happening. She shouldn't have removed your reasonable warning with no comment to you. You shouldn't have warned her vaguely when you could have asked her to explain what she was doing. So you both got pissed off at each other. You could probably still work it out with each other. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:11, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your time. That is an honest and fair assessment. I have decided to drop the issue as there was several things on both sides that were wrong and I at least will take what I did in this case and learn from it. Thanks for your help Fisher.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I recently wanted to get in to Wikipedia and I am totally new to this. I typed four tildes to sign my post like it says to do above. I'm not sure what I did wrong to make it say it was fake. Sorry for any trouble I caused in the talk page I was at...
