Welcome

Just thought I'd say Hi to everyone who leaves me comments. Whether they're good or bad, as long as they're constructive and relevant they will be appreciated and left on here :) I am not going to have a personal userpage, it will just divert to here
I am particularly contributing to "seventh gen console" pages (in particular System Software) Thanks for looking, and thanks for any comments you leave :)
Yours, chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 01:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Thanks

Just wanted to say thanks for helping reach a reasonable compromise on PlayStation 3 System Software. Hopefully we can move past that dispute now. =) —Locke Cole • t • c 23:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, I aim to please! and help improve wiki Chocobogamer (talk) 22:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving on 360 article

Please don't archive recent, active discussions where no clear consensus has emerged. xenocidic (talk) 13:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

duly noted. however, it was a discussion about something I made and changed back so I assumed I could close it Chocobogamer (talk) 22:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Speight

Please don't jump the gun on this, and wait for formal identification, if any. -- The Anome (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it was a good faith edit, I assumed, as many have, by their wording he had been formally identified. Chocobogamer (talk) 23:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Playstation Home

Please discuss the current dispute on the talk page, constantly reverting edits is counter productive. Remember WP:3RR. John .n-IRL 23:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already had! and I wasn't the one who broke the 3RR first! get your facts right before commenting on people's talk pages. Chocobogamer (talk) 22:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

8bitJake (talk · contribs)

There is a discussion about further sanctions against this user going on here on ANI. Based on the comment you left on his/her talk page, I suspect you might have something to contribute to the conversation, so I am bringing it to your attention. Toddst1 (talk) 23:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Niko Bellic

Whoa, sorry man. I was unaware of these talk pages and who kept changing it back. I'm a total novice at this site and I didn't even know how to read the comments and talk stuff. I'm really sorry, I'll never change his nationality again please don't report me or anything. I just read all your guys comments and stuff and I just wanted to say I'm sorry. But now that I see you've asked, I discovered he's Serbian during the mission "Easy Fare." Vlad makes a comment "Speaking of Serbs" as Niko walks in. Also in the beginning title sequence Roman says something like "Your english is better than my Serbian." Once again though, I didn't know about those messages. I'm very sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePhrozenPhoenix (talk • contribs) 21:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you can verify by simply renting the game and seeing for yourself. But if you'd prefer, I'll try and find the script or something over the internet or some sort of written text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePhrozenPhoenix (talk • contribs) 01:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation 3 game updates & install sizes

Since you created the article, I thought you should know that I created a section here about it: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#PlayStation_3_game_updates_.26_install_sizes. RobJ1981 (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of PlayStation 3 games

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I am going to semi-revert your last edit to List of PlayStation 3 games because you didn't have time to finish it and neither do I right now. I will put back in the bits you did finish. ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 19:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I kept the trophy statuses short like you did so that the column can be made narrower when needed. ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 19:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Virtual Console games (Europe)

Being there a while doesn't justify it being kept. See this discussion: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#A_question_about_PAL_conversion_issues_column_on_2_Virtual_Console_lists. The information is trivial at best, and not suitable for this encyclopedia. Relevant issues (that are sourced and actually notable) belong on the game articles, not just jammed into the list. Next time, please think before you revert just because the column has been there a while. RobJ1981 (talk) 00:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well it wasn't discussed on the article page, which is where it should have been discussed (as well as on the project) because more casual editors like myself are maybe not aware a discussions going on. It has not been discussed properly. chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 16:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS3 software

It's a speculation unless Sony gives a date or a Sony employee goes on record saying 15th even in the update to show off the newest PSP update it had no offical dateVault9Dweller (talk) 01:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nevermind found it Hopefully it's for all regions and not just UKVault9Dweller (talk) 01:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple IP addresses

There are plenty of them. If you wish to see the two dozen or so, look here. At the time, the user never denied them, and thusly defused all but two RfCU requests, which is reserved for only those IP addresses which seem to be acting in concert or too similar. Now that they have piled up, they cannot be explained away. I know you are relatively new here, but you need to check things out more carefully before aligning yourself with folk who might not deserve your kindness and loyalty. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 06:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, withdrawn 'support' for him chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 11:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries; I accidentally defended a former user, Sceptre, who turned out to be a former indefinitely blocked and banned user. It happens to everyone. No harm, no foul. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 14:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you, too, Choco. You're aces, Mister Man. :) - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 04:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dial back the registration talk

Wikipedia has more than one long term IP only editor who contributes positively to the encyclopedia. There is no requirement that anyone create an account and not creating an account isn't an automatic reason to assume bad faith. I'd recommend you dial back your harping on that as it doesn't benefit the discussion.--Crossmr (talk) 04:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is a discussion and I, like everyone else, am entitled to an opinion, and that is what I have aired. If you don't like it then thats your problem. Don't come onto my page telling me not to air an opinion. chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 13:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not requiring an account to edit wikipedia is a long standing tenant on wikipedia. If you have decided to take issue with that then I would suggest air your grievance in the proper venue, a single users talk page is not the right place to argue against long-standing and accepted tradition. This is also not your page, its a page you're allowed to use, which you're often given latitude with, part of the same tradition, but you don't own it. Its a place for other users to communicate with you, which was I was doing.--Crossmr (talk) 03:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get your facts right, I have not taken issue with it at all and have not simply assumed bad faith through the lack of registering, I am posting an opinion on why he hasn't registered in over 7 years, which I am entitled to do ANYWHERE relevant. /there is evidence in his posting that he does use a dynamic IP, and he has been abusive across multiple addresses. That is an abuse of the 'anyone can edit' rule - plain and simple. I didn't say I own it but it is the talk page for Chocobogamer, if you have a problem with opinion thats your problem. Do not go on peoples' talk pages telling them to air it somewhere else and not to air it where they feel its relevant. chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 10:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment/user conduct

I want to let you know that there has been a request for comment for user conduct initiated on User:Pé de Chinelo, a user in which you have been mentioned. If you have anything you wish to add to the RFC, please do so. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 08:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping me informed. I agree with what you are doing, so I added my name to the list of "Users certifying the basis for this dispute" (was I supposed add it there or in the section right below?). I'll look over the page in more detail later tonight when I have time and comment more thoroughly if necessary. -Zomic13 (talk) 18:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that this got four signatures, so it's active. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Best Selling Video Games

Hey I saw you recently reverted an edit where someone else changed Metal Gear Solid 2 from stealth to thriller. I didn't want to make any changes there but thought I would contact you as I agree with the user, Metal Gear Solid 2 isn't stealth at all like the other games. I don't remember there being any parts where stealth helped me when I played through it instead of just going into first person shooting mode and cleaning up. I would classify it as action or something other than stealth. --Xander756 (talk) 17:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GamePro classified it as "action" on their review when the game came out (http://www.gamepro.com/article/reviews/18204/metal-gear-solid-2-sons-of-liberty/) --Xander756 (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chocobogamer. You have new messages at MuZemike's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: best selling games

Hi there. It seems it stopped right now. The problem was that the anonymous was never warned. I warned him, and apparently it stopped. If he comes back, maybe a last warning for 3RR and block him for revert war instead. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!!

Happy New Year, and thanks for sticking by me when we were majorly upgrading the PlayStation Home article! Best Regards, Ffgamera (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tom Lennox

Posted a note in the admin board, and another admin blocked him for sockpuppet. He should not bother anymore. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 15:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of PlayStation Portable Slim and Lite/test

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 00:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create article forks in article space. You can do it in your User space if you want, but please see Wikipedia:Content forking. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 00:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

has been corrected, page not deleted though. apologies. chocobogamer mine 00:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To our newest Rollbacker

I have just granted you rollback rights because I believe you to be trustworthy, and because you have a history of reverting vandalism and have given in the past or are trusted in the future to give appropriate warnings. Please have a read over WP:ROLLBACK and remember that rollback is only for use against obvious vandalism. Please use it that way (it can be taken away by any admin at a moment's notice). You may want to consider adding {{Rollback}} and {{User rollback}} to your userpage. Any questions, please drop me a line. Best of luck and thanks for volunteering! upstate NYer 02:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou very much mate :o) chocobogamer mine 17:17, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Special Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this special barnstar to show appreciation to your explanations regarding the List of Virgin Media Channels. I couldn't find any other barnstar which suited my reasons for awarding, however this one covers randomness. Slight confusion and conflicting information from Virgin Media resulted in an unrequited debate, to which some uses resulted into casting personal attacks. Pr3st0n (talk) 12:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:PSP 2000 and 3000 merger proposal

I am not sure if you have done it already, as I don't edit PSP articles, but I support the comment you made on WikiProject PlayStation about User:Chocobogamer/pspsl. If you want to ask me to clarify, you can do so. ★Ffgamera★ - My page! | Talk to me! | Contribs 12:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Just a heads up, you probably don't need to respond to discussions that are 3 months old like you did on FF8 - the original posters aren't likely to come back and look for a response. --Pres N 23:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aeris

I'm just finding it confusing. It's like in a section we first use Kakarott and then change it to Son Goku or Zero. I have no intention in making this something big, but in the talk page it was decided to leave as Aeris the per mos from the final fantasy wikiproject.Tintor2 (talk) 00:07, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's better to keep the discussion in the FFVII talk page. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't remember for sure on the PC version, but swear I have this memory of seeing it come up as "Aerith", and changing it to "Aeris" cuz that's what I was used to after first playing it on PSX. Hmm, I don't have a save with her still in it to check. Ah, well. (Actually, come to think of it - when I just loaded it, it did have the Eidos thing at the front, so maybe it was a change? Although what's going on with the display to mess up the movies on my computer, I'd love to figure out... I KNOW they were working on this XP box last time I tried the game...) umrguy 42 20:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was designed for 9x and *just* worked out of the box on 2k. There were several patches for XP as stuff like videos got flipped and jagged to hell lol. I'm running 7 on all my systems bar my netbook so I doubt I have much chance of trying it. If I'm wrong then I apologies, I was just certain it was a straight port :) chocobogamer mine 20:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, don't worry, I could be wrong too (although I'm pretty sure on the Eidos thing, though). I do know it worked before on this XP box, even with current video card, I just wouldn't be surprised to find I'd changed a setting, or updated a driver, and it's going wonky :) BTW, I changed the Aerith/Aeris to a footnote per my suggestion, what do you think? Best, umrguy 42 21:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol, replied in discussion re Aeris. IIRC (I'm probably wrong as usual lol) the installer and pre-boot had the Eidos logo but the actual game was like the PS game (I could be getting confused with FF8 lol). Thanks for your help chocobogamer mine 21:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, as far as the PC version, well, it all just boils down to them really needing to do a PS2 remake (no, not the PSN thing, or PS3 - what can I say, it's all about me)... or even a straight-up PSX re-printing. (I bet there's enough people who've worn out/scratched up/broken/etc. their originals, plus people who still want it, based on eBay pricings, to make it worth while...) umrguy 42 21:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep an eye out over Xmas time, if you're lucky you may be able to do what I did, about 2 years ago I managed to pick up 2nd copies of 7 8 and 9 for bout £45 for all 3, brand new and sealed. I wanted to keep all 3 sealed but 1 arrived in a cracked case, and the original of another stopped working, so just FF7 (plat) is sealed now :( It appears they did a brief re-print in Europe before Christmas, maybe because it was 7's 10th bday, they may do it over Xmas again chocobogamer mine 21:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip, although I haven't seen any such thing lately here in the US. Although I did pick up 9 a year and a half to two years ago brand new from Amazon for either $15 or $20 (can't remember if it was the standard "Greatest Hits" price, or even more discounted - also bought the compilation of 5 & 6, as well as Chrono Trigger and FF4, for that price range). (Personally, I couldn't get into 8, just, I dunno. I'm still working on XII, though :D). umrguy 42 01:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Xbox360arcade.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Xbox360arcade.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.75.41 (talk) 03:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Xbox360core.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Xbox360core.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.75.41 (talk) 03:55, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Xbox360elite.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Xbox360elite.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.75.41 (talk) 03:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Pes-newps3box.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pes-newps3box.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.75.41 (talk) 03:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone is creating PSP-2000

According to the history, you merged that page into PlayStation Portable. However, that page is created again. Will you handle this situation please? Thank you! --Gh87 (talk) 05:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!!

		Merry Christmas!
		Merry Christmas Chocobogamer! May the Star of Bethlehem light your way to the Lord's feet on this holy night. God bless - Ffgamera

Xbox 360 sales figure is questionable

The source which says the console has sold 39 million on the Xbox 360 and List of best-selling game consoles page is very questionable, as it says "There are now over 39 million Xbox 360 consoles around the world" which implies that the console has shipped 39 million, not necessarily sold 39 million. What do you think? Because the last time I checked, the console had sold 32 million as of September 2009. (Here is the source. If you agree, sorry to pin this on ya, but could you please change all of the pages displaying this false figure? I've already done some of the Xbox 360 page, just need to do 7th gen, list of bestselling consoles and any I've missed out. Thanks. ★Ffgamera★ - My page! · Talk to me!· Contribs 10:27, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ballmer isn't the greatest wordsmith on the planet.. I would think that in 3 months it would have sold a few million at least, lead up to christmas and some good offers etc. so at minimum id guess 35m, but would there seriously only be 4m across the entire world in stores? if you split that across the countries across the cities across the stores etc you're talking only tens in each store, seems a bit too low. chocobogamer mine 00:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree that it would have sold a heck load, but according to various sources, PS3 has outsold the 360 in most of the months after September 09 and has only done so in 3 million lots. ★Ffgamera★ - My page! · Talk to me!· Contribs 02:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aeris/Aerith Reverts... (Final Fantasy 7 page)

Hi,

Re: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Final_Fantasy_VII

Sorry for my re-revert. Funny thing is, I was the person who reverted it to Aeris after an anon kept changing it to Aerith. It wasn't until I read the Aerith page that I decided to undo my revert... and it was late when I decided to revert my change back to the anon's, so I did not think about the "game specific" nature of the particular article (ie: it's the Final Fantasy 7 game page; a game in which she was called Aeris in all English versions).

Sorry for the confusion... though I expect the anon will go back and revert it to Aerith yet again (has done so numerous times already in the last few days).

Best, Robert

RobertMfromLI | User Talk STP2: Producer/Gaffer/Webmaster 21:10, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Nintendo DS sales

I have nominated Nintendo DS sales, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo DS sales. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. AirplanePro^Radio_Checklist 21:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation Home

Having participated in this discussion, you may be interested in Talk:PlayStation_Home#WP:ENGVAR. Some standardized rigour (talk) 07:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Nintendo DS colors and styles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Nintendo DS colors and styles, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nintendo DS colors and styles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]