Jump to content

User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/QEnigma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability

[edit]

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.


General notability guidelines

[edit]

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: It is essential to WP:AGF because it promotes a respectful and a welcoming atmosphere on Wikipedia. By assuming that other editors are acting with positive intentions, we build trust and encourage collaboration, which are critical to a project based on collective effort.

WP:BITE reinforces this by reminding experienced editors to be patient and supportive towards new users, who may still be learning Wikipedia’s policies and best practices. Harsh criticism or dismissive comments can discourage newcomers, potentially pushing them away from the platform altogether.

checkY. New editors make mistakes as they do not know the Wikipedia guidelines. Therefore it's important to avoid attacks on new editors which may result in unpleasant situations such as fights or their leave and subsequent loss to the community. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


2. In your own words, how does notability is defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: In Wikipedia, notability is a guideline used to determine whether a topic warrants its own article. A topic should have significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. This ensures that articles are about topics widely documented and recognised outside trivial or self-published mentions. It also should not fall into the parameters of WP:NOT policy.

checkY Good. Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: A step-by-step guide on "How to Change a Car Tyre" would not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, as Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. However, a broader article on car maintenance or tyre-changing, with significant coverage from reliable sources, may be considered notable, i.e., WP:NOTHOW.

checkY Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: WP:GNG establishes that a topic is presumed notable if it has significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. This guideline applies to most topics and serves as the default standard on Wikipedia. WP:SNG apply to particular subject areas, such as biographies, films, books, or academic journals.

When patrolling an article, first check if the topic falls under a specific notability guideline. GNG is the primary standard on Wikipedia. However, if the article does not meet the above criteria, you should refer to the relevant SNG guidelines for suitability.

checkY. Good. Both can be used when patrolling but those subject falls under SNG/SSG (sport specific guidelines) but fails to meet the WP:GNG guidelines would sometimes nominated for deletion WP:AfD for discussion to determine the status of the article. (We will cover AfD in later assignment). Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


Specific notability guidelines

[edit]

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: The topic of the "2024 Summer Olympics" would not be considered automatically non-notable simply because the article was created in 2019 without sources. Olympic games, both summer and winter, are planned years in advance and typically have substantial source material available to support the article. An article in such a state could be tagged for improvement.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.


6. A New York city based 2019 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: The criteria would be WP:ORG – Fail. The company does not meet the notability criteria, as an investment alone does not demonstrate significant, independent media coverage or recognition. Additionally, there is no evidence of notable success or widespread recognition within its industry.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


7. Nascimento Ferreira who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 8-0.

Answer: The criteria would be WP:MMANOT and WP:MMABIO – Fail. A fighter, as per above guidelines, could be considered notable if they have achieved significant recognition or being ranked. An undefeated record of 8–0 (as per the question) is noteworthy but does not guarantee notability. This fighter require more significant coverage and accomplishments to be considered.

checkY As per NMMA - subject needs to be ranked world top 10 or fought in a championship in tier one MMA promotion. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2025 and to be released on August 2026 in the cinemas.

Answer: The criteria would be WP:NF and WP:NFF – Fail. This movie project fail to meet the guideline which state Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles. Production has not commenced and possibly no wide media coverage either.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2025 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: The criteria would be WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN – Fail. A candidate for the US Senate is expected to receive significant national coverage. The availability and inclusion of such material are required for consideration of an article. Coverage from local newspapers alone does not meet the criteria outlined above. An exception could be made if there is significant past coverage or notable accomplishments.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2019 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer: The criteria would be WP:NMUSIC and WP:MUSICBIO – Fail. No information has been provided regarding the music album’s performance, including reviews, sales, or chart performance. Self-publishing on Spotify cannot be considered.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations


11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer: The guideline is WP:NPROF. He is cited as the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Economic Psychology (currently co-editor-in-chief). Several verifiable references are also available. According to criteria no. 8 of WP:NACADEMIC, this article meets the necessary standards.

checkY. The subject meets criteria 1 for WP:NPROF #1 [1] for being highly cited and #8 as the chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology [2]. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: The guide lines are WP:NKICK and WP:NMMA. Being, as of today, "one of only two fighters to win world championships in both MMA and K-1", and the "only fighter to simultaneously hold three championship belts", are significant accomplishments, supported by verifiable sources.

checkY. Well-done. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: The guide lines are WP:SINGER and WP:NACTOR. With regards to WP:SINGER, she meets criteria nos. 1–5, 8, possibly 10 (references required), and 11–12. In the WP:NACTOR, she meets both nos. 1 and 2 criteria.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: The guide lines are WP:EVENT and WP:EVENTCRIT. This event is major nuclear accident and qualifies within no. 1 of WP:EVENTCRIT (enduring historical significance and significant lasting effect).

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


15. Persepolis

Answer: The guide lines are WP:NGEO and WP:GEOFEAT. This is a major archaeological site very significant to world history. It is one of the key Iranian cultural heritage sites and a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1979, which adequately meet the criteria.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)


QEnigma Good day. See assignment 1 above. For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, guidelines, talk page messages, and any hist diff that is applicable. Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis. Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment). Pls book mark this page on your computer for ease to find this page. Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 22:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Thank you for setting up assignment no. 1. I wish to inform you that I have completed the above module. Best regards. QEnigma (talk) 09:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: Hello, this is just a quick reminder in case you missed my earlier submission alert. Best regards. QEnigma (talk) 03:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
QEnigma Reviewed. See comments. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 07:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: Thank you for the review. I am ready to move on to the next assignment. QEnigma (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)



Sources and content policy

[edit]
A. Sources
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.
You could contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on web due to Paywall content or printed books.



1.
Topic Explanation 5 Examples Comment by Cass
Reliable source A reliable source on Wikipedia is one that is published by a reputable entity, written by authors with expertise in the subject, and has a fact-checked, editorial process. Scholarly articles, reputable news outlets, books by academic publishers, and official reports are typically considered reliable. Self-published sources, opinion pieces, and user-generated content are usually not reliable unless the author is an established expert in the field.
  1. (example)The Guardian newspaper.
  2. BBC News, news organisation.
  3. CNN, news organisation.
  4. Associated Press, global news agency.
  5. Reuters, global news agency.
  6. PBS, non-commercial, free-to-air US television network.
User generated sources User-generated sources are materials created by individuals without editorial oversight, such as blogs, wikis, social media posts, and forums. They are generally not considered reliable on Wikipedia because they lack professional fact-checking and can be biased or inaccurate. Exceptions may apply if the author is a recognised expert, and the content is published on a credible platform.
  1. WordPress, blogs.
  2. Blogger, blogs.
  3. Facebook, social network.
  4. Reddit, social network.
  5. Twitter, social network.
Non Independent source Non-independent sources are materials closely associated with the subject they cover. While they may provide accurate information, they can lack neutrality due to potential bias or promotional intent. They are generally acceptable for straightforward factual details but not for contentious claims or analysis.
  1. Political campaign material published by the candidates.
  2. Unaudited and unverified financials from organisations.
  3. Major news organisations providing coverage of their own ownership.
  4. Government owned or state affiliated media.
  5. Press releases.



2.
Type Explanation Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary) Comment by Cass
Primary A primary source is an original document or direct evidence related to the subject. These provide raw data.
  1. (example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results
  2. Letters.
  3. Diaries.
  4. Memoirs.
  5. Autobiographies.
  6. Art work.
  7. Government documents.
  8. Legal records.
  9. Interviews.
  10. Personal newspaper columns.
  11. Scientific research documents.
  12. Manuscripts.
  13. Personal webpages.
  14. Photographs.
  15. Published books.
  16. Official government or non-government reports.
  17. Artifacts.
Secondary A secondary source is an analysis, interpretation, or evaluation of primary sources. These are considered more reliable for verifying facts and presenting balanced viewpoints.
  1. (example) newspaper
  2. Reviews by experts.
  3. Published material on a certain subject.
  4. Documentaries.
  5. Peer-reviewed research or articles.
  6. Historical or scientific reviews.
Tertiary A tertiary source is a compilation or summary of information from primary and secondary sources. These provide general overviews or quick references but are not suitable for detailed analysis or verification of specific claims.
  1. (example) encyclopedias
  2. Dictionaries.
  3. Text books.
  4. Almanacs.
  5. News aggregator or compiled material.
  6. Public online wikis.



3.
Subject Primary Secondary Tertiary Comment by Cass
Example: Art Example:Sculpture Example:Article critiquing the sculpture Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History Personal Memoirs by Ulysses S. Grant. A modern biography on Grant. Wikipedia article on Grant.
Science A research paper published in Lancet or New England Journal of Medicine. A review article analysing and summarising the published research studies. An encyclopaedia entry or a textbook that compiles general scientific knowledge.
Athletes Official competition results from a major sporting event. A biography or documentary about an athlete involved in the said competition. An athletic reference book or sports encyclopaedia that compiles general information.



4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer: Content on Wikipedia needs to be verified to ensure accuracy, reliability, and neutrality. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, verifying claims through reliable sources helps prevent misinformation, bias, or unverifiable statements, ensuring that articles provide factual and balanced information. This process maintains the quality and trustworthiness of the platform.


5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer:No. Wikipedia itself should not typically be used as a primary source. While it can be a useful starting point for general information, it is a tertiary source, meaning it compiles content from other sources. Since Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, its content may not always be reliable or up-to-date. Instead, it is better to cite the original, reliable sources referenced in Wikipedia articles.


6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer: An example of a reliable but not independent source would be a company's annual report. An annual financial report is a reliable source of information because it is produced by a reputed organisation, contains audited financial data, and is subject to legal and regulatory oversight. However, it is not independent because it is produced by the company itself and may present the information in a way that is favourable to its interests, potentially omitting or downplaying negative aspects.


7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer: An example of an independent but not reliable source would be a personal blog written by an individual without expertise in a particular field. For instance, a blog post about the health benefits of a new diet, written by a non-expert.

While the source is independent because it is not affiliated with any company or organisation and expresses the individual's personal views, it is not reliable because it lacks verification, peer review, or professional oversight. The information may be biased, inaccurate, or based on personal opinion rather than evidence-based research.



Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".


8.
David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011,[1] until his resignation on November 9, 2012[2] after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.[3]

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008),[4] a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.[5]

In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad[6][7]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/ Yes The source is major newspaper Yes The source is reputable published source Yes The source discusses the subject directly and in detail ✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch Yes Independent of CNN (at the time). Yes CNN is a major news source. Considered reliable. Yes Would have covered his swearing in but the URL is wrong. Other sources exist to support. ✔ Yes
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893 Yes Huffpost article originating from the Associated Press. No Un-named 3rd party accounts and not verified information. Yes The article is about Petraeus. ✘ No
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012 Yes Not affiliated with the website. No Geni is comprised of user generated content. Therefor not reliable. No An user generated profile page of the father of Petraeus. No verified information. ✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005 Yes Independent report. Not affiliated. Yes Vanity Fair is considered reliable. Yes The article is about Petraeus. ✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html No An interview with Petraeus. Primary source. Not independent. Yes PBS is considered reliable. Yes The article is about an interview with Petraeus. ✘ No
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html Yes Independent. Not affiliated. Yes The Independent is considered reliable. Yes The article is about Petraeus. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Petraeus sworn in as CIA director". CNN. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  2. ^ Johnson, Kevin (November 9, 2012). "David Petraeus resigns from CIA". USA Today. Retrieved November 9, 2012.
  3. ^ "Petraeus Shocked By Girlfriend's Emails". HuffPost. 2012-11-12. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  4. ^ "Sixtus Petraeus". geni.com.
  5. ^ "David Petraeus' Winning Streak". Vanity Fair. March 30, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  6. ^ "beyond baghdad". www.pbs.org. 2004-02-12. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  7. ^ "David Petraeus: General Surge". The Independent. 2007-09-08. Retrieved 2019-10-11.


9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

David Petraeus is a former US Army general and Director of the CIA, with extensive coverage by major news outlets. He meets the requirements listed on WP:BIO and WP:ANYBIO. Also the currently depreciated WP:MILPEOPLE criteria.



10.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. [1] Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA.[2] He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.[3]

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor.[4] In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy.[5] Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/ No IMDb is user generated content. No IMDb cannot be considered reliable. ? URL not working. The article could have been about the subject. ✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales No Lennon is a member of BAFTA. Not independent. Yes BAFTA is a reputed organisation. No The article does not refer to Lennon. ✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125 No LinkedIn is user generated. Not independent. No LinkedIn cannot be considered a reliable source. ? Currently there is no profile of Lennon. ✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/ Yes BTVA is advertised as visual and audbile guide to voice actors. Appear independent. No Community driven. Does not appear to be reliable. No The article list the individual as Jordan David and list only one role from one title. No significant other information. ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Jordan D. Lennon". IMDb. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
  2. ^ "BAFTA Cymru". www.bafta.org. 2014-06-16. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
  3. ^ Lennon, Jordan. "LinkedIn Account". LinkedIn. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  4. ^ "Jordan David - 2 Character Images". Behind The Voice Actors. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  5. ^ "BFI Film Academy". Tape Community Music & Film. 2016-08-24. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Fail. Does not meet any of the four criteria listed at WP:CREATIVE.



12.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player.[1] She won five Grand Slam singles titles.[2] Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000.[3] She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships,[4] which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.[5]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/ No This is her own Instagram page. No Instagram is user generated. Yes This her profile. ✘ No
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html Yes Independent. No affiliation. Yes Reputable major news organisation. Yes The article is about Hingis. ✔ Yes
[3] Yes Appear to be independent. No affiliation. Yes Written by Paul Fein, a renowned tennis writer, coach and player. No No significant reference to Hingis other than trivia material. ✘ No
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis Yes Indpendent. Not affiliated. Yes ESPN is a major sports news source. Yes The article is about Hingis. ✔ Yes
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis Yes Independent. Not affiliated. Yes The Guardian is a reputable newspaper. Yes The article is about Hingis. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Martina Hingis (@martinahingis80) • Instagram photos and videos". www.instagram.com. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  2. ^ "Martina Hingis wins her 25th Grand Slam championship, the women's doubles crown at the U.S. Open". Los Angeles Times. 2017-09-11. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  3. ^ a b Paul Fein (30 January 2003). Tennis Confidential: Today's Greatest Players, Matches, and Controversies. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 197–. ISBN 978-1-57488-526-2.
  4. ^ "Done again? Why Martina Hingis decided to retire for a third time". ESPN.com. 2017-10-26. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  5. ^ Staff; agencies (2007-11-01). "Tennis: Martina Hingis retires amid cocaine controversy". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Martina Hingis is a renowned former tennis player with significant media coverage and this article meets all the 5 guidelines from WP:NTENNIS criteria.



14.
Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan.[1][2] Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture."[3] This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.[4]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/ Yes Independent. No affiliation. Yes A reputable news source. Yes The article is about Wright. ✔ Yes
https://franklloydwright.org/work/ No Not independent. A foundation dedicated to Wright. No Not a reputed news source. No oversight. Yes The article is about Wright. ✘ No
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm Yes Independent. No affiliation. Yes BW online is considered a reputable news source. Yes The article is about Wright. The given URL is not functioning. Used the Internet Archive instead. ✔ Yes
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC Yes A biography written by a 3rd party author in 1991. Wright died in 1959. Yes Written by an author with a number of publications to his credit. Pubished by a major publisher. Yes The book is a biography of Wright. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ Hoffman, Barbara (2017-06-07). "Famed architect Frank Lloyd Wright had a dark side". New York Post. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  2. ^ "Frank Lloyd Wright's Work". Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  3. ^ "BW Online | July 28, 2004 | Frank Lloyd Wright: America's Architect". web.archive.org. 2008-03-02. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  4. ^ Robert C. Twombly (24 April 1987). Frank Lloyd Wright: His Life and His Architecture. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-85797-6.


15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Frank Wright is one of the most noteworthy architects of the 20th century with significant professional achievements and coverage. This article meets all four guidelines for the WP:ARCHITECT criteria.



QEnigma Good day. See assignment 2 above. Please ping me when you have finished with the assignment and ready for a review. Cassiopeia talk 20:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: This is to confirm that I have completed assignment no. 2 and am submitting it for your review. Please let me know once you have completed your evaluation. If it meets the expected standard, I would be obliged if you could kindly proceed with posting assignment no. 3. Best regards. QEnigma (talk) 15:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/QEnigma&oldid=1259324836"