User:Anonymous anonymous/RFA Criteria
I can't think of a better name. Suggestions are welcome. Anonymous__Anonymous 16:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
To be finished...
Exceptions may apply
Edits
[edit]| Username | (RFA Nominee) |
| Total edits | (4500 minimum) |
| First edit | (Nominee must be in wikipedia for 7 Months or more and must be active for a long time) |
| (main) | (700 minimum) |
| Talk | (70 minimum) |
| User | (Doesn't matter) |
| User talk | (500 minimum) |
| Image | (2 images uploaded or more) |
| Image talk | (Doesn't Matter) |
| Template | (Doesn't Matter) |
| Category | (Doesn't Matter) |
| Category talk | (Doesn't Matter) |
| Wikipedia | (350 minimum) |
| Wikipedia talk | (10 minimum) |
I will support RFA if...
[edit]- ...the nominee answered the RFA questions well
- ...the nominee is civil and friendly ( Wikipedia:Civility )
- ...the nominee handled conflicts with another user in a friendly manner
- ...the nominee has 4500 edits or more
- ...the nominee participates in WikiProjects (Wikiproject Books, Concordia etc.)
- ...the nominee has welcomed new users (and is friendly to them, WP:Bite)
- ...the nominee has reverted pages from vandalism
- ...the nominee was a former sysop and chose to reapply
- ...the nominee has started at least one article
- ...the nominee is trusted by the Wikipedia Community (has received barnstars from others, never vandalized, etc...)
- ...the nominee uses Edit Summaries frequently or Always
More to be added
I will oppose RFA if...
[edit]- ...the nominee has been blocked two or more times for breaking the Three Revert Rule
- ...the nominee is an owner of abusive sockpuppets
- ...the nominee is uncivil and unfriendly, Wikipedia:Civility (especially to newer users: WP:Bite)
- ...the nominee doesn't think that the "community side of wikipedia" is important
- ...the nominee is unfamilliar with Wikipedia Policies
- ...the nominee is a frequent "spammer"
- ...the nominee is not really interested in becoming an admin
- ...the nominee doesn't provide good answers to the RFA questions
- ...the nominee doesn't appear to show great interest in gaining admin status per answers to questions
More to be added
Note to remember
[edit]We are all human and we all make mistakes. Nobody is perfect