Thibodaux massacre
Thibodaux massacre | |
---|---|
Part of the nadir of American race relations | |
![]() Louisiana sugar cane laborers c. 1880 | |
Location | Thibodaux, Louisiana |
Date | November 22–25, 1887 |
Target | Sugar Cane Workers (90% Black) |
Deaths | 35–50 |
Injured | unknown (possibly hundreds) |
Perpetrators | White paramilitaries and State Militia |
The Thibodaux massacre was an episode of racial violence that occurred in Thibodaux, Louisiana on November 23, 1887. It followed a three-week strike during the critical harvest season in which an estimated 10,000 workers protested against the living and working conditions which existed on sugar cane plantations in four parishes: Lafourche, Terrebonne, St. Mary, and Assumption.
The strike was the largest strike in the history of the industry and it was also the first strike to be conducted and coordinated by a formal labor organization, the Knights of Labor. At planters' requests, the state sent the militia to protect strikebreakers from ambush attacks by strikers, and work resumed on some plantations. Black workers and their families were evicted from plantations in Lafourche and Terrebonne parishes and retreated to Thibodaux.
Tensions erupted into violence on November 21, 1887 when white regulators stormed a black-owned barroom and killed one black laborer and wounded another. Violence continued on November 23, 1887, when local white paramilitary forces responded to two town guards being wounded by attacking black workers and their families. Although the total number of casualties is unknown, the consensus is that at least 35 black people were killed during the next three days (some historians estimate that 50 black people were killed) and the total tally of killed, wounded, and missing was rumored to number in the hundreds,[1][2] which makes it one of the most violent labor disputes in U.S. history. Reportedly, the victims included elders, women and children. All of the people who were killed were African American.[3]
The massacre, and the passage of discriminatory state legislation by white Democrats, including the disenfranchisement of most blacks, ended the organizing of sugar workers for decades, until the 1940s. According to historian John C. Rodrigue, "The defeated sugar workers returned to the plantations on their employers' terms."[2]
Background
[edit]Conditions of sugar laborers
[edit]The harvesting and processing of sugar cane comprised a complex series of steps which needed to be closely coordinated by a large labor force which was pushed to work to the point of physical exhaustion. Sugar plantations were called "factories in the field" and their workers died at a high rate during the era of slavery. Conditions were little improved after Reconstruction.[4]
A major issue arose in the early 1880s when plantation owners began cutting wages and forcing sugar workers to accept scrip for pay due to a declining international sugar market.[4] These "pasteboard tickets" were redeemable only at company stores, which operated at high profit margins. As the plantation kept the books, often illiterate workers were increasingly bound by debt and unable to get free. Required by law to pay off the debt, workers became essentially bound to the plantation in a state similar to slavery.[1] Most of the cane workers were black, but there were also whites. The Knights of Labor used the scrip issue to organize workers, and thousands joined the group.[2]
In October 1877, Duncan F. Kenner, a millionaire planter, founded the statewide Louisiana Sugar Producers Association (LSPA), consisting of 200 of the largest planters in the state, and served as president. The powerful LSPA lobbied the federal government for sugar tariffs, funding to support levees to protect their lands, and research to increase crop yields. For the next decade these members also worked to gain control over their labor. They adopted a uniform pay scale and withheld 80 percent of the wages until the end of the harvest season, in order to keep workers on the plantations through the end of the season. They ended the "job" system. The largest planters, who maintained stores, required workers to accept pay in scrip, redeemable only at their stores.[5]: 190
Labor struggles
[edit]The workers resisted, mounting some actions each year contesting some part of the LSPA's program. The state government supported the powerful planters, sending in state militia when the planters used convict lease labor from prisons to harvest and process the cane.[5]: 190
In 1887 the Knights of Labor organized a major three-week sugar strike against cane plantations in Lafourche, Terrebonne, St. Mary, and Assumption parishes. Most plantations were idle. The strike was organized by the national Knights of Labor organization, who had established Local Assembly 8404 in Schriever the preceding year.
In October labor representatives delivered demands to the LSPA that included an increase in wages to $1.25 a day, biweekly payments, and payment in currency instead of the "pasteboard tickets", or scrip, redeemable only at company stores.[1]
As the LSPA ignored the demands, the Knights of Labor called the strike for November 1, timed to coincide with the critical "rolling period" of the crop, when it had to be harvested and processed. The work stoppage threatened the entire sugar cane harvest for the year. The 1887 strike was the largest labor action in the industry, involving an estimated 10,000 workers, a tenth of whom were white. It was the first time a formal labor organization had led a strike in this region.[1]
Strike suppression
[edit]The planters appealed to Louisiana Governor Samuel Douglas McEnery, who was also a planter. McEnery, declaring, "God Almighty has himself drawn the color line," called out ten infantry companies and an artillery company of the state militia,[5]: 190 sending the latter to Thibodaux, the parish seat and "heart of the strike." They were to protect strikebreakers and suppress strikers; they evicted workers from plantation housing. The militia suppressed strikers in St. Mary Parish, resulting in "as many as twenty people" killed or wounded on November 5 in the black village of Pattersonville.[5]: 191
The militia protected some 800 contract workers brought in to Terrebone Parish, and helped capture and arrest 50 strikers, most for union activities. The strike collapsed there, and workers returned to the plantations.[5]: 191
Many of the black workers in Lafourche Parish retreated after eviction to the crowded black residential section of Thibodaux, and the state militia withdrew. They left it up to local officials to manage from there.
Prelude
[edit]Newspapers reported that on November 1, the same day the Knights of Labor called the strike, strikers concealed in a cane field fired upon white replacement workers at the Lacassagne plantation in Tigerville (present-day Gibson) in Terrebonne Parish, wounding four workers.[6] Over the next three weeks leading up to the massacre, strikers allegedly used threats and gunshots from ambush to intimidate replacement workers. A number were wounded in attacks upon sugar houses, one losing an eye, and one man reportedly died from his wounds.[7] According to newspaper accounts, around November 13, Theodule Baille, a sugar boiler riding on the bayou levee, was fired upon about a mile below Thibodaux. Shots were also reportedly fired at white workers on two plantations near Thibodaux.[8]
A New Orleans newspaper reported that "for three weeks past the negro women of the town have been making threats to the effect that if the white men resorted to arms they would burn the town and [end] the lives of the white women and children with their cane knives."[9] Similarly, in the days leading up to the climactic event in Thibodaux, it was reported that "[s]ome of the colored women made open threats against the people and the community, declaring that they would destroy any house in the town" and that "[n]ot a few of the negroes boasted that in case a fight was made they were fully prepared for it."[10] One historian adds:
As late as November 21 some still comported themselves with confidence, and perhaps bravado, on the sidewalks. Mary Pugh, widow of Richard Pugh, owner of Live Oak Plantation in Lafourche Parish, reported "meeting negro men singly or two or three together with guns on their shoulders going down town & negro women on each side telling them to 'fight - yes - fight we'll be there.'"[11]
After the event, one Thibodaux newspaper repeated the claim that prior to November 23, "[t]he negroes were in motion [and] [t]heir women boasted that they were ready to fire the town."[12] The white editor of the Lafourche Star newspaper (who participated in the killings[3]) also offered this attempt at justification for the severity of the vigilante committee's response:
The loud-mouthed "wenches" must bear in mind that though they have a tongue, they are not priviledged [sic] to make use of such threats as "burning the town," ["]slaughtering the whites from the cradle to the grave," etc.[13]
Attacks
[edit]Part of a series on the |
Nadir of American race relations |
---|
![]() |
Parish District Judge Taylor Beattie, who owned Orange Grove Plantation and was a member of the LPSA, announced formation of a "Peace and Order Committee" in Thibodaux. He declared martial law, and recruited 300 white men for his committee to serve as a paramilitary group.[5]: 191 He ordered blacks within the city limits to show passes to enter or leave.[1] Like many top-ranking white state officials, Beattie was an ex-Confederate and former slaveholder. He was a former member of the Knights of the White Camelia, a group that had worked to suppress and intimidate black voters during Reconstruction.[14]
On Monday, November 21, two black men had been shot—a man named Watson died, and a second man, Morris Page, was wounded.[15] Judge Beattie ordered the paramilitary to close the entrances to the city on the morning of November 22 and stand guard.
Someone fired from ambush on two of the pickets, John G. Gorman and Henry Molaison, seriously wounding both. An eyewitness, another guard, described the initial attack on Gorman:
We were fired upon while seated at a camp fire except [for] Mr. Gorman[,] [who] was standing at [it]. This firing came from ambush in a corn field opposite. When the shot was fired Gorman threw up his right hand to his forehead, said ["B]oys, I am severely wounded. I am bleeding from the eyes and mouth.["] I then helped Mr. Gorman to home [and] had been gone but a short distance when I heard the second shot fired which I think came from ambush. This was followed by 5 or 6 shots which sounded like shots from a rifle. The 1st shot fired which hit Mr. Gorman sounded as a shot from a shot gun.[16]
Molaison was shot shortly after Gorman. According to another eyewitness, a white resident of the neighborhood:
[A]bout 5 o’clock I heard a shot fired. A moment after I heard two more fired one after the other. The moment I heard the two last shots I heard the guard cry out, that he was shot. I got out of my bed immediately[.] [T]hey ordered me out of my house to advance. I cried out ["]I am a friend advancing to assist.["] The guard Henry Molaison understood my voice, he said ["P]rotect me if you can.["] I said ["]I will[.] [The guard said] ["L]ook in the ditch[,] you will find my rifle close by me.["] I was handed a pistol and a rifle then at the same time. I reach to pick Mr. Molaison up[.] [H]e said ["D]on't pull me[;] you hurt my leg.["] . . . I then took Mr. Molaison on my back into my house which is forty feet from the railroad. The guard was stationed on the right hand side of my fence. The shot that struck the fence was a heavily loaded gun. [From] the sound of the gun the sound was that of a shot gun. I am a [sic] old hunter and consider myself an expert and can distinguish the sound of a gun. . . . In my portion of the town the negroes seemed bo[a]stful and threatening before the shooting of the guards.[17]
After the two white pickets were shot and wounded, a local volunteer company, the Clay Knobloch Guards, went to the scene and claimed to also have been fired upon from ambush. They reportedly returned fire and fatally shot six blacks and wounded four others, and captured several loaded shotguns.[15] The company and other white vigilantes immediately started to round up and kill black workers and family members. They targeted known and suspected Knights of Labor organizers. The victims were killed in town and where they tried to hide in the surroundings woods and swamps. Some bodies were reportedly left in shallow graves or the swamps.[1][2] On November 26, 1887, the bodies of three blacks were found in a thicket on the Allen Rienzi plantation. It was believed they had been wounded on Wednesday and had taken refuge where they were later found dead.[15]
A New Orleans black newspaper, The Daily Pelican, described the scene:[18]
'Six killed and five wounded' is what the daily papers here say, but from an eye witness to the whole transaction we learn that no less than thirty-five "...fully thirty negroes have sacrificed their lives in the riot on Wednesday..."[15] Negroes were killed outright. Lame men and blind women shot; children and hoary-headed grandsires ruthlessly swept down! The Negroes offered no resistance; they could not, as the killing was unexpected. Those of them not killed took to the woods, a majority of them finding refuge in this city.[19]
In the same account, that newspaper claimed that the two pickets were shot by other white guards from Shreveport, to create a pretext to initiate the wholesale slaughter of the black strikers. But the Shreveport state militia company reportedly left Thibodaux two days earlier.[20][21] Henry Franklin, the owner of the nearby coffee house and bar where the two black men were shot on November 21, plainly stated on November 24 that the shooting of the two pickets was perpetrated by "colored people who were out on the strike." Based on hearsay estimates, he stated that the number of dead amounted to 25.[22]
The Daily Pelican account quoted above is apparently one source for the casualty figure of 35. According to historian Rebecca Jarvis Scott, "No credible official count of the victims of the Thibodaux massacre was ever made; bodies continued to turn up in shallow graves outside of town for weeks to come."[3] Eric Arnesen wrote that local white residents privately admitted more than 50 workers were murdered in Thibodaux, but the total was uncertain.[citation needed] Along the Bayou Lafourche, black oral history has told of hundreds of casualties, including wounded and missing.[2]
James Keith Hogue attributes 50 deaths to the three-day attacks by the paramilitary, saying that in addition, numerous Knights of Labor organizers disappeared over the next year. He likened these actions to the violence and intimidation by the White League in Louisiana in the 1870s, when they murdered black voters.[23]
Aftermath
[edit]The known victims of the fatal violence of November 23, 1887 were Willis Wilson, Felix Pierre, Archy Jones, Frank Patterson, Grant Conrad, Marcellin Walton, Riley Anderson, and Mahala Washington.[24] John G. Gorman, the first picket shot by the strikers, lost an eye from the lead slug that struck him on the side of the head and exited his mouth through the palate, shattering the bones along its path.[25] The other picket, Henry Molaison, was unable to walk without assistance a month after his wounding.[26] The severity of their injuries was attributed to the fact that the lead slugs that struck them were roughly "chopped from a bar of lead," and thereby presumably intended to cause massive injuries on impact.[27]
After the massacre, labor organizing among sugar workers essentially was suspended, with plantation workers returning to work under the owners' terms. White Democrats, who dominated the state legislature, soon passed laws for disenfranchisement of blacks, racial segregation and other Jim Crow rules. [citation needed] There was no more effort to organize sugar workers until the 1940s.[2] It was then initiated in the context of increased civil rights activism after World War II.
In that same period, beginning during the war, many Louisiana blacks joined the Great Migration to the North and West Coast to escape the continuing violence and racial oppression. It was not until the mid-1960s that the civil rights movement achieved the passage of Congressional legislation to enforce civil and voting rights for African Americans and other minorities in the United States.
In May 2017, descendants of both the African-American workers and Louisiana plantation owners commemorated those killed.[28] The Louisiana 1887 Memorial Committee, in partnership with the University of Louisiana Lafayette Public Archeology Lab, is attempting to verify a mass gravesite on private property, with plans for examination and proper burial in volunteered churchyards of any victims found. In May 2017, the Thibodaux City Council officially condemned the violence and acknowledged that the event occurred. The Lafourche Parish Council did likewise in November 2017.
Representation in media
[edit]- The Thibodaux Massacre: Racial Violence and the 1887 Sugar Cane Labor Strike, a book released in 2016 by The History Press written by John DeSantis, details the events.[29] It provides eyewitness accounts obtained from documents in the U.S. National Archives and names eight of the victims. It also provides a detailed history of U.S. Civil War veteran Jack Conrad (b. 1834) who was wounded during the incident and whose records provide new information and insight. (It did not include the details relating to the precipitating attack upon the pickets Gorman and Molaison, although a brief mention is made of the existence of the public records of the coroner's inquest in which those details were documented.)
- The film The Man Who Came Back (2008), directed by Glenn Pitre, presents a very loose adaptation of the events, putting a Western genre plot on top of the sugar strike and massacre. The film was never released in theaters but played at the New Orleans Film Festival.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f Bell, Ellen Baker, "Thibodaux Massacre (1887)", KnowLA Encyclopedia of Louisiana, 15 September 2011, accessdate 23 April 2017
- ^ a b c d e f John C. Rodrigue, "Thibodaux Massacre", in Eric Arnesen, editor, Encyclopedia of U.S. Labor and Working-class History, Volume 1, 2007, p. 826
- ^ a b c Rebecca Jarvis Scott, Degrees of Freedom: Louisiana and Cuba after Slavery, p. 85
- ^ a b Eric Arnesen, Encyclopedia of U.S. Labor and Working-class History, Volume 1, p. 825
- ^ a b c d e f Hogue, James Keith (2006). Uncivil War: Five New Orleans Street Battles and the Rise and Fall of ...
- ^ The New Orleans Times-Democrat, November 24, 1887, p. 2; The Dayton (Ohio) Herald, November 3, 1887, p. 1
- ^ The Daily Picayune, November 21, 1887, p. 1
- ^ The Opelousas Courier, November 26, 1887, p. 8.
- ^ The New Orleans Times-Democrat, November 24, 1887.
- ^ The Lake Charles Echo, December 9, 1887, p.6.
- ^ Rebecca J. Scott, Degrees of Freedom: Louisiana and Cuba After Slavery, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005, p. 84.
- ^ The Weekly Thibodaux Sentinel, November 26, 1887, p.2
- ^ The Weekly Town Talk (Alexandria, LA), December 3, 1887, p.1.
- ^ Joe Gray Taylor, Louisiana, a Bicentennial History, American Association for State and Local History, 1976, pp. 107, 135
- ^ a b c d The Opelousas courier., November 26, 1887, Supplement, Image 8
- ^ Coroner's Proces Verbal, Parish of Lafourche, Book A [1876 - 1900], p. 210, Affidavit of F.H. Gruneberg, Civil Records of Lafourche Parish, Clerk of Court. (Previously unpublished)
- ^ Coroner's Proces Verbal, Parish of Lafourche, Book A [1876 - 1900], p. 211, Affidavit of Leon Gilbert, Civil Records of Lafourche Parish, Clerk of Court. (Previously unpublished)
- ^ The Weekly Pelican, 26 November 1887
- ^ Howard Zinn, 2004; [1], retrieved March 27, 2009.
- ^ Thibodaux Sentinel, December 10, 1887, p.3
- ^ John C. Rodrigue, Reconstruction in the Cane Fields: From Slavery to Free Labor in Louisiana's Sugar Parishes 1862–1880 , Louisiana State University Press, 2001, p. 186.
- ^ The Times-Democrat (New Orleans), November 24, 1887, p.1.
- ^ Hogue (2006), Uncivil War, p. 192
- ^ Coroner's Proces Verbal, Parish of Lafourche, Book A [1876 - 1900]. p. 209, Civil Records of Lafourche Parish, Clerk of Court.
- ^ The Pineville News (Pineville Mo.), December 2, 1887, p.1; The Weekly Thibodaux Sentinel, December 12, 1887, p.3.
- ^ Thibodaux Sentinel, December 24, 1887, p.3
- ^ The Pineville News (Pineville Mo.), December 2, 1887, p.1.
- ^ Japan Times May 12,2017
- ^ "The Thibodaux Massacre Left 60 African-Americans Dead and Spelled the End of Unionized Farm Labor in the South for Decades | History | Smithsonian Magazine".
Further reading
[edit]- Rodrigue, John. Reconstruction in the Cane Fields: From Slavery to Free Labor in Louisiana's Sugar Parishes, 1862–1880. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001.
- DeSantis, John. "Tracing an Atrocity: How an Obscure Affidavit in the National Archives Unraveled a Historical Mystery". 12 June 2017. Prologue Magazine, summer 2017, volume 49, number 2.
- Smithsonian Magazine. 2017. "The Thibodaux Massacre Left 60 African-Americans Dead and Spelled the End of Unionized Farm Labor in the South for Decades."
External links
[edit]- IMDb.com, Inc. (2010). "The Man Who Came Back (2008) - Full cast and crew". IMDb. Retrieved 2010-07-03.
- Conflicts in 1887
- 1887 in Louisiana
- 1887 labor disputes and strikes
- 1887 murders in the United States
- 1880s strikes in the United States
- November 1887 events
- Massacres in 1887
- History of African-American civil rights
- Racially motivated violence against African Americans
- African-American history of Louisiana
- Massacres of protesters in North America
- Massacres in the United States
- Agriculture and forestry labor disputes in the United States
- Labor-related violence in the United States
- Vigilantism in the United States
- Crimes in Louisiana
- Labor disputes in Louisiana
- American Federation of Labor
- American sugar industry
- History of racism in Louisiana