Template talk:Radio-broadcast-stub

This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles

Radio

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

I edited to make it more general, while most of the stubs are about programs, I felt the stub should encompass all of radio, as I was also tagging a radio station article with it, and there are a few other radio station articles tagged. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 09:46, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

But {{broadcasting-stub}} or one of its country specific subcategories like {{US-bcast-stub}} are already in use for radio stations. And anyway, just changing the category link is the wrong way to go about this, since if you want the articles to appear in the new category, you'd need to null-edit them all. Any change this big to the scope of the stub should go through WP:WSS/P anyway, but since there are already separate station-related templates, I wouldn't really see the point of it. Grutness...wha? 12:59, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fair enough, I'll use that one then. Thanks. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 22:43, August 9, 2005 (UTC)