Template talk:Lists of companies and organizations editnotice

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList

Companies

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Organizations

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization

Issue with wording

This template states "Red links or entries not linked to an article will be removed," which seems to violate WP:LISTCOMPANY, as listed items need only meet WP:GNG criteria at maximum, which doesn't always correlate with a a Wikipedia article already existing. I would think wording closer to something like Template:Dynamic list editnotice would make a lot more sense here, and better follow Wikipedia guidelines. Yitzilitt (paid) (talk) 01:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC) Yitzilitt (paid) (talk) 02:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yitzilitt (paid): this editnotice isn't for every list of companies, only those with stricter inclusion criteria (usually due to the area getting a lot of spam, or list size being otherwize unmanageable). Callanecc thoughts? (template creator) Elli (talk | contribs) 02:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reading WP:LISTCRITERIA, it does seem worth noting that criteria must be "supported by reliable sources" — I'm not entirely sure about this, but it seems to me that having a meta-criterion (like this one) in which inclusion requires existing inclusion on another page is a bit against the spirit of WP:RS, which generally assumes independence from the subject. Maybe that's a silly objection on my part, but it felt worth getting out there. Yitzilitt (paid) (talk) 02:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]