Template talk:Brisbane landmarks

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland

	Australia portal Brisbane landmarks is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
	This template is supported by the Brisbane task force.
	This template is supported by WikiProject Queensland.

Geography

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Category for "Buildings & Structures"

To improve navigatibility of this template, I propose to link the heading for |group1=, "Buildings & structures", to be linked to Category:Buildings and structures in Brisbane. Any objections?

Also, in line with MOS:HEAD, I think the group headings should not be be written in title case but in sentence case; thus: "Buildings & structures", "Nature and parks", "Cultural institutions". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New section

Maybe this template should have a former or historical section for places that have been demolished such as Brisbane Festival Hall and Cloudland. - Shiftchange (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe they should have been left in the template? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, either way their inclusion has merit. - Shiftchange (talk) 12:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have just returned them both to their former position in the template. As mentioned, it might be a good idea to create a special historical section for these buildings, as well as for other demolished buidlings of interest. Figaro (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane Powerhouse

Should the Brisbane Powerhouse occur twice on the one template? The Arts and Culture sections is probably best as it is more general. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sport

Sport is on here twice.

I am removing one of them.144.137.191.8 (talk) 06:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]