This template is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Categories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of categories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CategoriesWikipedia:WikiProject CategoriesTemplate:WikiProject CategoriesCategories articles
Well, what I'm really worried about is the redlinks in the decade row... For instance, if I set the decades row up to "jump" every ten categories (decades) the same way the years row does, we'd end up with this when looking at something in the 2010s: "Decades:2010—2020—2030—2040—2050—2060—2070—2080—2090—2100" which, obviously, is a bit of a problem considering it would literally be decades before most of these would/could be created. I could instead just expand the decades row to display the 2010s category in addition to the rest... Thoughts? 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000)18:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to just tack the 2010s link on to the end of the list and remove the Decades: bit - it'll suffice for the next decade, I think, at which time (assuming this particular template (or templates as we know them) is still being used) the problem will have to be properly addressed. =) 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000)19:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
