Template:Did you know nominations/Vápenice (natural monument)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Vápenice (natural monument)
[edit]... that the natural monument Vápenice in Prostějov District, the Czech Republic, is a former limestone quarry?
- Reviewed: Neotrogla, Banksia montana
Created by Jan.Kamenicek (talk). Self nominated at 16:29, 2 May 2014 (UTC).
New enough and long enough. 2 QPQs have been offered but this nomination only appears to be promoting one page. Is this correct? I notice fn2 mentions "the area was used for livestock grazing and minor limestone quarrying" but the article says "after former limestone grazing and minor limestone quarries" - should the article be changed to "livestock grazing"? Per WP:CITE I would like to see a few more inline citations in the second paragraph. Article has no close paraphrasing issues, sources are sufficient, hook is cited but a bit wordy. Perhaps an alternative could be suggested. C679 06:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notes. Meanwhile I expanded it and added some sources. Could you have a look at it once more, please? As for the number of pages: yes, I propose just one page to be introduced in the DYK. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 14:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the natural monument Vápenice in the Czech Republic is a former limestone quarry? Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
