Template:Did you know nominations/Reactive Scientific Research Institute
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 12:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Reactive Scientific Research Institute
Katyusha rocket launchers firing during WWII, which were developed at RNII
- ... that the Reactive Scientific Research Institute developed the Katyusha rocket launcher (pictured)? Source: [1]
- Reviewed:
- Comment: could also use “created” rather than “developed”
Created by Ilenart626 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC).
The page is well-referenced, long and new enough. No copyvio was observed. The prose is generally good though I made some minor edits. The hook is very interesting and supported by a reliable source but '(pictured)' should be inserted at the end (in Italic). However, the last sentence of the lead is just a bit baffling; "...and its research and development were very important for later achievements of the Soviet rocket and space programs." In what terms was it "very important"? I mean this line is just vague and even maybe POVish. --Mhhossein talk 13:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Mhhossein: and thanks for carrying out the review. Adding '(pictured)' sound fine. The last sentence of the lead is supported by the two quotations from Siddiqi and Chertok in the "Legacy" section. During my research for this article I found a number of comments on how important RNII was to the Soviet space program, so I thought it was worthwhile to include this detail in the lead. Note that I used "very important" as Siddiqi used "extremely important". What do you think? Ilenart626 (talk)
Hi Ilenart626, Ah I just noticed the quotes in the "Legacy" section which I think are compelling enough. We can go ahead with the nomination after '(pictured)' is added. --Mhhossein talk 06:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Already added (pictured) see above Ilenart626 (talk)
- Hi @Mhhossein: and thanks for carrying out the review. Adding '(pictured)' sound fine. The last sentence of the lead is supported by the two quotations from Siddiqi and Chertok in the "Legacy" section. During my research for this article I found a number of comments on how important RNII was to the Soviet space program, so I thought it was worthwhile to include this detail in the lead. Note that I used "very important" as Siddiqi used "extremely important". What do you think? Ilenart626 (talk)
References
- ^ Chertok, Boris (31 January 2005). Rockets and People (Volume 1 ed.). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. p. 167. Retrieved 29 May 2022.