Template:Did you know nominations/Oil in Turkey
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 02:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Oil in Turkey
- ... that some oil in Turkey comes from Russia, and Turkey sends diesel to the EU? Source: https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2023/06/29/how-russia-dodges-diesel-sanctions
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kharayeb
- Comment: Am I allowed to reuse this QPQ if Template:Did you know nominations/Climate change in Puerto Rico is rejected? If not let me know and I will do a new one.
Improved to Good Article status by Chidgk1 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Oil in Turkey; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Comment: @Chidgk1: you need to review one nomination for every article you nominate, so you do need to do another QPQ for this nomination. Template:Did you know nominations/Climate change in Puerto Rico was reviewed and then rereviewed, so there is no reason to not count it as a nomination. TSventon (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- n
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @Chidgk1: Good article, but i'm not exactly a fan of the hook. Could a better one be made? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onegreatjoke (talk • contribs) 20:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Batman has extra heavy? Source: https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/TUR page 3 ...Türkiye’s proved oil reserves, which are primarily located in the southeastern provinces of Batman ... https://merip.org/2020/10/the-unintended-consequences-of-turkeys-quest-for-oil/ "The petroleum was very heavy" Chidgk1 (talk) 15:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Chidgk1: Maybe expand on the extra heavy because just saying Extra Heavy makes no sense. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am hoping that making no sense will intrigue people to click it as I thought that was the point of a hook. I thought a hook was supposed to be clickbait. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- There's somewhat of a difference if a fine line between a hook that is intentionally vague to encourage people to read, and a hook that is so vague that it makes no sense and thus drives away readers. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am hoping that making no sense will intrigue people to click it as I thought that was the point of a hook. I thought a hook was supposed to be clickbait. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Chidgk1: Maybe expand on the extra heavy because just saying Extra Heavy makes no sense. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Batman has extra heavy crude? Source: https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/TUR page 3 ...Türkiye’s proved oil reserves, which are primarily located in the southeastern provinces of Batman ... https://merip.org/2020/10/the-unintended-consequences-of-turkeys-quest-for-oil/ "The petroleum was very heavy"
- @Onegreatjoke: I assume that many readers will be American and many Americans know the superhero - of course ALT2 might make no sense on first reading but turns out to be grammatically and factually correct Chidgk1 (talk) 16:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
@Onegreatjoke: does this new hook satisfy your concerns? Z1720 (talk) 16:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Approving hook Alt2. I think the play on words and the possible confusion with the superhero is what makes this hook "hooky"; somewhat in the vein of the type of hooks we run on April fools day. For me this is a good hook for this particular article which is on a relatively dry topic. The hook fact is accurate and verifiable to the cited source. Article is within policy, and the nomination was made in the proper window. Hook alt2 can be promoted.4meter4 (talk) 21:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)