Template:Did you know nominations/Love (Alexander Milov sculpture)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 02:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Love (Alexander Milov sculpture)
- ... that the Love sculpture (pictured) by Ukrainian artist Alexander Milov represents two wire-frame adults who appear to be alienated, but inside their bodies two children reach out to each other? Source: Source
- ALT1: ... that the Love sculpture (pictured) which was featured at the 2015 Burning Man festival began as a small tape and wire sculpture? Source: 2007...The composition was made of tape and wire in the size of 75 x 45 x 175 cm. Subsequently, the series was presented at the Kiev Museum contemporary art in the framework of the exhibition "JUST AS IT IS", but went unnoticed.
- ALT2: ... that the Love sculpture (pictured) was the first Ukrainian artwork to receive a Burning Man festival grant in 30 years? Source: Source, Source
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Church of All Saints, Houghton Regis
- Comment: I struggled with the hooks, because I wanted to make note of the fact that the artist is Ukrainian. Open to other hooks of course.
Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 22:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC).
- Comment, not intending to review. I am no expert in copyrights, but my broad understanding is that sculptures are independently copyrighted, and photographs cannot have a more permissive license than the underlying art. Some relevant exceptions are listed here, but I can't make sense of whether they apply. Urve (talk) 05:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- 'Comment' No doubt image is interesting one. As suggested in above comment first get image reviewed for Copy right. Then go for article review. Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the image does not appear to be free. There's more information about this at Commons:COM:FOP US, but the short version is that while images of buildings can generally be freely licensed, images of sculptures generally can't. It really is a shame – that's a gorgeous picture! I've nominated it for deletion on Commons, so we'll find out soon enough if I'm right or wrong. Also, I've italicized Love in the hooks. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 03:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
@Bookku, Ezlev, and Urve: Hi all. I did not upload the photo to commons, but found it there - and it has been there 5 years now. It could have been an artist upload as it is crystal clear and there are no festival goers near. But I am going to remove it from this nomination so that a review may proceed. A photo deletion process will likely take a while. I will also delete it from the article. Bruxton (talk) 03:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- IMHO the image is sort of central to this DYK and I hope we will afford to wait for couple of days for it's availability if possible. Meanwhile I will do some legwork for reviewing some rest of aspects as you suggested. Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 13:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
QPQ: 
IMHO Actually this is a must have DYK, but the image is sort of central to this DYK and if we afford to wait for couple of days for it's availability if possible. User seems active in review but I need help of some one else in count and confirming qpq requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookku (talk • contribs) 13:51, May 1, 2022 (UTC)