Template:Did you know nominations/JetBlue Mint

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Article has been merged

JetBlue Mint

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

A JetBlue Airbus A321

• ... that each JetBlue Mint (aircraft pictured) passenger gets two power outlets?

• Reviewed: List of awards and nominations received by Emma Stone

Moved to mainspace by SSTflyer (talk). Self-nominated at 07:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC).

• New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Hook cited to RSes. Image okay. GTG. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 23:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

• This hook fact is incorrect. There are two power outlets per row of economy seats not per passenger. It could be reworded to

• ALT2 ... that each JetBlue Mint (aircraft pictured) passenger has access to two power outlets? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

• @Cwmhiraeth: not incorrect. "JetBlue Mint passenger" refers to passengers flying in Mint class. Economy class passengers on Mint-configured aircraft are not Mint passengers. Not that I mind if ALT2 is used, though. SSTflyer 10:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

• OK, I get it. Restoring tick as per Jakob, either the original or ALT2 hook could be used. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

• ALT2 hook was pulled from main page after about four hours; it was the subject of a discussion on the DYK talk page that objected to the hook and the article is proposed to be merged into the main JetBlue article. I've struck it and the similar original hook. The commented-out ALT1 hook also looks promotional in nature ("dedicated premium product"). Nomination is on hold until the merge discussion is settled, and a new hook is proposed; given the hook's short tenure on the main page, it is eligible for another go if it remains a separate article. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)