The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment: A little poetic license but essentially true as Los Oficiales Elite's gimmick is that they are police officers and they did lose to three Exotico wrestlers who are essentially drag queens.
Created by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 21:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC).
Not too happy with the amount of "poetic license" in this hook. It's one thing misleading on April Fools day, it's quite another for the rest of the year. WormTT(talk) 10:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Alt2=... that during the 2016 Guerra del Golfo wrestling show, a group of wrestlng drag queens beat up Los Oficiales Elite (wrestlers dressed as police officers)?
Change "beat up" to "defeated" and I'll be happy. WormTT(talk) 20:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Really? defeated? So super litteral then, no room for anything other than the bare simple facts as a second opinion overturns the first opinion? MPJ-US 21:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
@Worm That Turned: - So let's shift to something that (hopefully) is totally straightforward, neutral and cited in the article. MPJ-US 16:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
My issue with "beat up" was that it implies a fight outside the ring, whereas defeated focussed on the match. You're almost certainly right in that defeated isn't a strong enough word, but at least it focussed on the ring. No issues with Alt3, and it appears to be sourced (though the source appears to be a dead link, it's currently cached in Google). If you're happy with it, then I'm happy. WormTT(talk) 17:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I'm good. I will check on the source, it was working the other day so I'll figure out what's going on there. MPJ-US 19:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Link worked fine for me when I clicked on it MPJ-US 19:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
@Worm That Turned: - So this was pulled from the cue on April 23, new hook suggested April 24 but it's still just sitting here? Is the new hook good to go? MPJ-US 22:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Odd I never got that ping... Sorry, I completely forgot to put in the , Yes, this is good to go with ALT3. WormTT(talk) 09:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)