Template:Did you know nominations/Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Length/age
Child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome
[edit]- ... that surveys conducted estimate 10% of all females have been a victim of child sexual abuse, and almost 2% by their own father?
Created/expanded by 1StrangerSC (talk), ProBonoPublicoA90 (talk), Lena xo (talk). Nominated by 1StrangerSC (talk) at 19:09, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Article is only 850 characters. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
The size of it has been topsy turvy since the nomination. Here's why:
- August 1 - day of nomination, it was a 5X expansion with 29,251 characters of readable prose
- August 3 - Tagged for NPOV, and sysop Arthur Rubin deleted most of the article, explained on the Talk Page, leaving it with 863 characters of readable prose
- August 10 - ProBonoPublicoA90 added expansion, taking it back up to a 5X expansion with 17,748 readable prose
- It has issues with sourcing, as most paragraphs are not sourced. But, hopefully, ProBonoPublicoA90 will add sourcing to those paragraphs, and communicate here. And, hopefully, this can go through the whole DYK process and/or all concerned on this can communicate on this template, so the DYK process isn't left hanging.
- Maile66 (talk) 23:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, right now we have sourcing issues, we have non-neutral, essay-like prose... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback, I will work on this and get back to you very soon. I really appreciate your help.
- ProBonoPublicoA90 (talk)
- There are a number of articles available online. These are the first three that I found: here, here, and here. It seems that it could be a great article with all the available information. Anne (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Eight days after the last edit, the article has not been expanded a single bit and continues with 863 characters of readable prose. I think this should just be failed. --Diego Grez (talk) 19:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
