The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Comment: There were a few thousand edits made to this page during the week. Digging deep into the history, this is the pre-expansion version of December 23, with 4498 characters of prose. That would require an article size of 22,490 for a full 5x, and as of this moment, it is 22,978.
Overall: @Muboshgu: Article seems good. You could probably do some more expansion while also cutting down the lead to four paragraphs per MOS:LEAD. But this can still pass I believe. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)