Talk:Zach Slater and Kendall Hart

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Sourcing

This article needs to cite a few references, of course. And maybe some expansion on the couple's history.Flyer22

Proposed deletion

I have placed a {{prod}} tag on this article, as I don't believe it meets guidelines for a supercouple. Can anyone provide sources that this couple has won awards, or is genuinely notable outside of the fan community? --El on ka 16:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try and work on this article. If you still feel that it can't stay, Elonka, of course do as you must. Flyer22 05:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need a little time to improve this article. I removed the deletion proposal based on this. If the changes I make to this article still fail this article's position for inclusion, then by all means...delete this article, if necessary. Flyer22 03:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated article

I gave it a complete overhaul. Flyer22 19:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 06:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article now has been rated B-Class. Flyer22 (talk) 03:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Proposed title created as a redirect. Jenks24 (talk) 15:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zach Slater and Kendall Hart → Kendall Hart and Zach Slater – No matter how commonly used any name is, Kendall went first by appearance. Although both Kendall and Zach are equally prominent characters, Zach was created partially as Kendall's love interest. And not every male should be first in the title. George Ho (talk) 22:52, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Against the move. When it comes to titling an article, WP:COMMONNAME (except for rare exceptions) is what matters, not either of the characters' individual popularity. They are most commonly called Zack and Kendall, Zendall, or Zen, not the other way around. I know that you feel that the name that should be the lead name in the title of a soap opera couple's article is that of the character who is more popular and/or more prominent, and that we should have the female's name come first more often, like we discussed at the Erica Kane and Dimitri Marick article when it was titled the other way around, but that's not how the Wikipedia naming policy works. I'm not looking to debate this; my opinion on this matter won't change. But I will alert WP:SOAPS to this discussion. Flyer22 (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Against Caringtype1 (talk) 07:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. "Zach and Kendall" seems to be more the common name[1]. And we have the common portmanteau of "Zendall", combining "Zach and Kendall", to describe the couple.[2] Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment whatever the case, the proposed title should redirect if it isn't the article title. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Zach Slater and Kendall Hart. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://soapoperadigest.com/features/amc/articles/zenquiz/
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://soapoperadigest.com/features/supercouples/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]