Talk:Youngest British soldier in World War I

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Youngest British soldier in World War I article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Youngest British soldier in World War I appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 December 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that according to the Imperial War Museum, the youngest authenticated British soldier in World War I was a 13-year-old machine gunner at the Somme who had enlisted at age 12?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Youngest British soldier in World War I.

Wikipedia

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move

As mentioned in the discussion here at this article's DYK nomination, at least two of us are of the opinion that this article should either be divided between its subjects; moved to British child soldiers; or moved to Child soldiers during World War I. Compare, e.g., the other articles in Category:Child soldiers. — $Llywelyn II$ 10:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a problem with such an expansion of the article, I even think it is a good idea. However, such an expansion would be a substantial amount of work and I am not intending to do it. If you are, you have my support, but I don't think the article should be retitled as it is with no intention of expanding because that is not currently its subject. That I wouldn't support.

The article was originally a WP:CSD#G13 rescue. After rescuing it I discovered Lewis' story had very recently been (re)discovered so I added it. That's as far as I intend to go with this but good luck to anyone else who wants to take it on. Spinning Spark 17:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PUS

pretty much crosses off the Daily Mirror and Daily Mail for use here. The Telegraph article is just written about having read the Times article, so you're really down to one source for most of this. Go ahead and remove the tabloids and make sure the ST article supports the info here. — $Llywelyn II$ 11:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PUS does not forbid the use of tabloids as sources, it only suggests that they should not be used if more respected source exists. Both the Mail and the Mirror have snippets of information that do no appear in other sources so there use is justified even according to WP:PUS, only an essay in any case. The Mirror in particular is hard to exclude as it was this paper that reported the case at the time in 1916. In any case, if multiple sources are demanded but only one broadsheet source is found then the logic of WP:PUS must be that tabloid sources are allowable under such circumstances. I don't follow your argument that the Telegraph is to be excluded because it is reporting what someone else said. That is the very definition of secondary source which is what Wikipedia is supposed to rely on. Spinning Spark 18:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage

In its present form, this is also a somewhat misleading article. It seems to be mostly focused on who 'wins' the 'distinction' of being the youngest child soldier. In fact, military use of children is a generally sickening and (frankly) barbaric practice. There should be thorough explanation of the lengths the British went to to avoid the use of children and greater focus on ways some kids (and these miscreants in particular) circumvented those measures. (In the alternative, if the Brits were fine with kids or grew increasingly fine with kids as the war dragged on, focus more on that.) — $Llywelyn II$ 10:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding of recruiting practices at the time is that it was very much the case that rules were routinely bent to allow underage boys to sign up. Twelve and thirteen year olds were quite rare and probably recruiting officers would fish them out if they suspected they were that young, but nevertheless, underage soldiers were far from isolated cases.

This article is not currently about child soldiers in WWI, it is about the yougest soldier. As I said above, I don't have a problem with it being refocused, but that's a bigger job. If we are just talking about Lewis (or his predecessor met by Maher) then the article exactly addresses the title. You won't find a source on Lewis that focuses on anything other than him being the youngest soldier in the war. Spinning Spark 18:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Developing this article

Spinningspark, I'm looking to expand this article to be a more general discussion of underage soldiers in the British army during the first world war and depending on it's size once that's done I may look at expanding it to cover child soldiers in ww1 more generally.--Llewee (talk) 15:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's a different subject and should be a new page. This article has always been about the youngest soldier. That can only be one person. The more general topic is an important (and horrifying) piece of history and is certainly something that should be written, but this article is a poor starting point for that. SpinningSpark 16:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]