Talk:Wulfings

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norse history and culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology: Norse mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Norse mythology work group.

Wolf clans

Yo; just serving notice that I'm going to start (soon, not right now) a disambig or list page on Wolf clans, since there's so many variations/cultures (and other "animal clans"); see Laxgibuu - the wolf clan of the Tsimshian and which has cognates/cousins among neighbouring peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast; the Oneida, Lenape (see List of Chiefs of the Wolf Clan and its talkpage), Cherokee and others also had wolf clans. A bit of a non sequitur but just to note its forthcoming existence....Skookum1 (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 February 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wulfing → Wulfings – all related articles (Wuffingas, Hundings, Geats, Lombards, Vikings) use the plural with the "s". Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 07:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ "Edgetho had started a feud by killing a Wulfing warrior, Hathlaf" In ictu oculi (talk) 09:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@In ictu oculi: Perhaps revisit? It looks like you are referring to an adjectival use here. Dekimasuよ! 21:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was an off the cuff response to a nom with no guideline cited, I was just wondering why we should make any exceptions to WP:PLURAL. But until now I for one didn't realise it specifically makes an exception for national groups, example Belgians. so Support per exception listed. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Of course. You could also write: "Edgetho had started a feud by killing a Viking warrior..."! Or a Geat warrior. Or a Lombard warrior. Why is this article different? They're peoples. They're pluralised if the article is about the people as a whole. Of course you can also write any of them in the singular; that's blatantly obvious. And also completely irrelevant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per standard. :bloodofox: (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.