Talk:Wonderland Sydney

Sydney's Wonderland was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 January 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Wonderland Sydney. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wonderland Sydney article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Wonderland Sydney. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Wonderland Sydney at the Reference desk.

Australia: Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wonderland Sydney is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Amusement Parks Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Closing down

Does anyone remember when Wonderland closed down the owners used every excuse in the book from SARS to terrorism to insurance for the closure??? Doesnt it seem a little funny that the site is now at the junction of two motorways and being redeveloped as commercial land Soundabuser 09:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Funny as in twisted, not haha. I find it really disappointing that no value was seen in the place by the owners except of course the monetary value the land offered. It has to be said the place didn't do too well in its lasted couple of years of operation. However, nothing was done to give the park a boost since the new owners took over, so it would seem they had little intention to keep the place going from the get go. I think its sad. Tinkstar1985 11:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tracked down that article about them blaming everything and added the information to the article :) Freikorp (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map???

Does anyone have a map they can scan? It would be very helpful to show just how large the theme park was —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.61.50 (talk) 10:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fate of the rides

I removed the text "A former employee did make a list of what happened to some.[1]" and the external link to the pdf article. I checked it a few months ago and it was a detailed well written page. Unfortunately it is now a dead link, the home page "www.wonderlandhistory.net" now simply has the text "Nothing to see here". If anyone knows what happened to the pdf article or has a copy let me know, I'd love to get a copy. Freikorp (talk) 06:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the domain expired on March 18 this year [2] Freikorp (talk) 06:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so upon randomly checking the link is working again, don't ask me what's going on with the website, I don't know. Anyway I've added it back to the article. I've also saved a copy of the Pdf in case the site goes down again. Freikorp (talk) 03:42, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]