Talk:Wohlgeboren

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Royalty and Nobility

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles

Requested move 29 December 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages to the proposed titles at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Doubt German really is correct use here per WP:GLOBAL. These are not confined to just German language. Until English language alternatives may be researched and presented, would Latin as lingua franca be more suitable, as seen in Pater Patriae? Chicbyaccident (talk) 01:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hesitant – I'd need to see more evidence about usage in English-language sources. Otherwise, leave it. Dicklyon (talk) 04:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: the articles primarily deal with German usage and the titles reflect that. And why should Latin be used? The Almanach de Gotha was written in French. Opera hat (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Odd that the Latin equivalent of "high-born" should be "most illustrious" when it ranks below erlaucht which means simply "illustrious". Opera hat (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that is what the article says. Anyhow, it is clear that the topic is not confined to German language, despite what the WP:WEIGHT of the current status of the article indicates. Chicbyaccident (talk) 17:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A specific foreign-langage term may be widely used in English to describe a topic globally, think of sprachraum or the T–V distinction. What do English-language sources say? Kim Post (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:08, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.