Talk:William T. Cooley

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Aviation / Biography / North America / United States / Cold War / Post-Cold War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Status

Is he fired ... or is he still there? The article says he was fired ... the Info Box says "years of service = 1988 to present". Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. The info is wrong. Fired in the military means discharged. I will be editing that bc being relieved of command is not being discharged. He didn't even get confined, just a forfeiture of pay Chefs-kiss (talk) 13:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sentenced

Sentenced: [1]. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding sexual assault claim deletion

I don't think it's proper to include it in the section it was included. If the writer wants to include a section about it with reporting then go ahead. I however oppose it. For the following reasons:
1. He was charged with art. 120 which under the UCMJ is titled "Rape and Sexual Assault Generally', this means he was charged with sexual assault.
2. The counts themselves are specifications. It's true that art. 120(3) is for sexual contact but the charge is 120.
3. The listed articles are all military news. To claim widely reported is not substantiated. Perhaps a list of more civilian news is more apt. Chefs-kiss (talk) 13:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]