Talk:William Gascoigne (scientist)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on William Gascoigne (scientist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070831163710/http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk:80/~ipswich/Observations/ToV/Horrocks.htm to http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~ipswich/Observations/ToV/Horrocks.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Gascoigne (scientist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030235901/http://www.rod.beavon.clara.net/leonardo.htm to http://www.rod.beavon.clara.net/leonardo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Death.

Webster's excellent 'The Towneley group and seventeenth century science' (1966) includes the following:

"Gascoigne is generally thought to have been killed at Marston Moor in 1644. This is incorrect, since his death was described in various accounts of the battle at Melton Mowbray in February, 1645. The mistake appears to have been due to Richard and Charles Towneley, who informed Thoresby and Sherburne that Gascoigne was killed at Marston Moor."

Does anyone know of a corroborating text? as I don't want to get into a edit war with one-to-one conflicting references. Astronomy Explained (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

I have just checked Peter Aughton's well researched biography The Transit of Venus: The Brief, Brilliant Life of Jeremiah Horrocks, Father of British Astronomy and he agrees giving Webster as his source. I would say something to the effect of "some have said that Gascoigne died a Marston Moor but Webster says this is a mistake" etc. etc. That way there won't be any doubt as to why it's being changed and no room for an edit conflict - see:Wikipedia:Conflicting sources Richerman (talk) 23:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Year of Birth

The intro of the article states he was born in 1612, but the first paragraph of the main text says 1611. Which one is right? CielProfond (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

There seems to be some disagreement about the year but most sources say 1612 so I've changed it to that. Richerman (talk) 22:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Awesome; thanks! CielProfond (talk) 01:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)