Talk:Wilburton Trestle

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

http://www.railfanswelcome.com/RailfansWelcome.htm claims that this is the longest trestle in USA. Brianhe 22:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1902 or 1904?

Article currently contradicts itself about when the line opened. - Jmabel | Talk 01:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, almost all links I've found (other than those that rely on the wikipedia article) give 1904 as the opening date. Here's one link from a 2003 Seattle Times article: [1] — 02:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

1904 seems much more probable to me, since that is the date that Wilburton as a community claims as its origin. - Jmabel | Talk 04:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given a total lack of citation for 1902, I believe we should change this to say 1904, consistently. - Jmabel | Talk 04:57, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. The 1902 date wasn't added to the article until November 2007. The same edit added a source that may have supported the date, but the link is inactive so I can't confirm this. The 1902 category was added in March 2008, most likely just following the infobox data. — Myasuda (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]