Talk:When I Am King
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Footnotes
[edit]Well, they are my new toy. But they also make it easier for a casual observer to see both what's linked to all at once, and quickly find links that are not referred to in the text. The former might come in handy in an AfD discussion, the latter in checking for linkspam.
brenneman(t)(c) 11:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Rave card
[edit]What's a rave card (said to be one of the influences)? ++Lar: t/c 02:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- A flyer (pamphlet) of about Postcard size used to promote a rave. -- Dragonfiend 04:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. used in the article. And in editing it I saw the handy dandy (commented out) "how to use footnotes thingie", I might start doing that too because I always forget. I'm a fan of leaving notes to myself inside comments in stuff I'm working on... But I like the other style of footnote better, although it is more complicated since the templates take more parms... ++Lar: t/c 06:25, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- That comment can be automagically placed by useing {{subst:footnotestext}}. - brenneman(t)(c) 23:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Way cool. I'll have to try to remember that. (there's so MUCH to remember) Thought you were on wikibreak??? LOL. ++Lar: t/c 00:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- That comment can be automagically placed by useing {{subst:footnotestext}}. - brenneman(t)(c) 23:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. used in the article. And in editing it I saw the handy dandy (commented out) "how to use footnotes thingie", I might start doing that too because I always forget. I'm a fan of leaving notes to myself inside comments in stuff I'm working on... But I like the other style of footnote better, although it is more complicated since the templates take more parms... ++Lar: t/c 06:25, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Plot summary?
[edit]I think a plot summary (or at least a good summary of what the comic's about) would be useful, even though from what I've heard it could be a bit tricky to pull off. Unfortunately, since I don't read the webcomic and can't think of any good third-party sources, I can't really write one myself.
Oh, and I moved the media quotes to a section. I'm not entirely happy with the results, but the article read far too much like an ad (or a detailed justification for inclusion) and far too little like an article before for my liking. This didn't improve it as an article, but it did make it far clearer that it needed work. - makomk 17:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Dates?
[edit]No dates are mentioned in this article. CFLeon (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Image?
[edit]@Fortdj33: why would this article need a second image? The logo of the webcomic (if you can call it that) has the same motif as the image currently in the article, meaning that adding that wouldn't really add recognizability or anything to the article. What kind of image were you thinking of? ~Mable (chat) 20:06, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on When I Am King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091208130436/http://www.ccawards.com/2002.htm to http://www.ccawards.com/2002.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)