Talk:Westfield Chatswood

This article was nominated for deletion on November 26, 2006. The result of the discussion was speedy close.

	Australia portal Westfield Chatswood is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

Several people mentioned in the above AfD that a merge may be desireable, and this appears to have been done before. Anyway, it probably makes sense to discuss whether this information is best represented in its own article or in Chatswood, New South Wales. IMHO, the article's probably just about borderline right now; it only boils down to one long or two medium-sized paragraphs worth of real information, which I think fits better in the parent community's article. However, if anyone feels there's a good chance for further expansion, it may be best in its own article. JYolkowski // talk 17:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely support a merge, as I do not believe that this article currently has enough information to stand on its own, per WP:CORP. If more verifiable information becomes available later, it would be easy enough to split things back out to a separate article. --Elonka 19:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not merge - Following several AfD's I have been steadily improving the articles linking back to The Westfield Group and I would appreciate them not being merged before Feb 2007. Could any such discussion take place at talk:The Westfield Group - oh, you already have tried there it seems there is no consensus to merge these articles. Ga rr ie 04:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The Westfield Group logo.svg

The image Image:The Westfield Group logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]