Talk:Western Block Party

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Manitoba / British Columbia / Saskatchewan / Alberta / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

These parties really need to unify if they have any hope of succeeding.

Christie's defence of Holocaust deniers

including reference to Christie's defence of Holocaust deniers is relevant here because:

Christie is the founder of the party;
Christie is the leader of the party;
Holocaust-denial is very much a "fringe" perspective, like Western separatism; and
it helps explain why the WBP and the Western Canada Patty are unlikley to merge as an anon editor suggested above: the latter is unlikely to want to risk being seen as extremist by associating with Christie.

Ground Zero | t 21:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these Western sepratist fringe groups have far-right sympathisers as their members or leaders. A white dominated Western Canada is the underlying theme, though never explicitly stated but neverthless comes out form time to time if one digs deep enough, also the supporters are white anglophones that are anti-minority, anti-immigration and detest multiculturalism. Aslo, they resent the domination of eastern Canadian cities that are more multicultural, not only overall but even in their European population i.e more southern europeans and jews in TO and Montreal while the west was in the past mostly anglohone or Western european dominated, but that has changed in the recent decades, Vancouver is now equally diverse and thus Western sepratism is not an idea that appeals to them, Also support for sepratism has been historically the weakest in Winnipeg, Manitoba 20:05, 09, February 2006 (UTC)

Logo

[Their] official logo with Elections Canada is a bit different. Pete Peters 22:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wesbloc2.png

Image:Wesbloc2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monarchy

So what is this parties plan should they ever succeed in regards to the monarchy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamhaw (talk • contribs) 22:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]