Talk:Werner Erhard and Associates
Appearance
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Werner Erhard and Associates article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does this article still suffer from self-published sources?
[edit]There's a banner on the article suggesting so, dating from 2008. Is it still relevant after all this time? If now what needs to be done? DaveApter (talk) 14:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- I’ve looked through the article and no longer see any self-published sources. I’ll go ahead and remove the tag.RecoveringAddict (talk) 19:19, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- Start-Class New religious movements articles
- Mid-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles