Talk:Water, Water Every Hare

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: American / Looney Tunes Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Source for name "Rudolph" ?

I'm pretty sure what the scientist actually calls the monster is "Bruda" not "Rudolph" I note that in the film "Count Yorga, Vampire" - the count refers to his large barely-speaking manservant as "Bruda". I'm not sure if there is some historical meaning to this term. Google yields no insights.

I did find interesting youtube showing Cartoon Network's captions of this short and it tells us that the scientist is addressing the monster as "Rudolph". I still don't hear it like that. Perhaps you could listen to this vimeo and weigh in thank you.

CITIZENS! around 3 minute mark, tell me whether the scientist is addressing the monster as "Bruda" or "Rudolph" http://vimeo.com/93231191 - MistySpock (talk) 21:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gossamer's character's name is in fact "Rudolph". [1] PJM (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WaterWaterEveryHare.jpg

Image:WaterWaterEveryHare.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was released MCML thats 1950. Just watched it. So 1952 is incorrect 2600:1008:B032:EDCF:0:39:DDDC:C201 (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]