Jump to content

Talk:Washington State Route 902

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWashington State Route 902 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 14, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 902/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --PCB 17:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Good writing.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    In ref 3, why is WSDOT abbreviated?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Whatever.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I don't have any issues with this article, so I'll pass it. You might want to explain how exactly was the definition changed in 1991.