Talk:Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Film: British / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Television: British Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Animation: Films / Television / Stop motion

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Stop motion work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

redirection

I genuinely forget how to do it but Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl and Vengeance Most Fowl should redirect here instead of the main series page Jblitz15 (talk) 04:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now a moot point per a request made at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 22:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

There is a draft on this film, why was a new article with less sources and less information created? SuperWikiBrother (talk) 13:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Wallace & Gromit" or "Wallace and Gromit"

Should we use the ampersand or just simply "and"? Every other Wallace and Gromit article except for Curse of the Were-Rabbit uses "and", so should we go with that? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 18:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to a previous move request, they cited that "Most sources and the teaser trailer use the ampersand", which sounds like a good enough reason to me. Harryhenry1 (talk) 05:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fair to me, "Wallace & Gromit" it is then. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 11:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wrong Trousers

I just think that we should put the fact that the film is a sequel to The Wrong Trousers, specially because the other Wallace and Gromit films don't have continuty, and this film is basically an actual sequel to The Wrong Trousers, even if there were three films released before, by bringing the penguin back. Mr. Doggy Dog (talk) 17:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's only one interpretation of the word "sequel", and it's not the most basic meaning. A Close Shave, Curse of the Were-Rabbit and A Matter of Loaf and Death are all sequels to The Wrong Trousers, just as The Wrong Trousers is the sequel to A Grand Day Out.

The important thing to say here — and the thing you seem to be getting at — is that this movie brings back a major character from The Wrong Trousers. Which is what the lead currently says, clearly and directly: It features the return of the villainous penguin Feathers McGraw from The Wrong Trousers (1993). So what's the problem? Popcornfud (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gnome Working Song mention

should we include the Gnome Working Song in the music section? Balfe and Nott did work on it after all, according to the credits. Visokor (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great source

[1] Lankyant (talk) 02:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allusions

I have added an allusions section, as they are such a prominent and enjoyable element of the film. Please do add more in if you have better film knowledge than me. QuakerActivist (talk) 16:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this is WP:OR and against Wikipedia policies. We'll need coverage in reliable secondary sources to add this information. Popcornfud (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah shame, but accept. I guess the plot section should be source referenced too? (Not that I wrote that). QuakerActivist (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, MOS:CULTURALREFS applies here. As for "Plot" sections, per MOS:FILMPLOT, the film itself is the reference as long as the description is basic and does not have divergences (like theatrical cut versus director's cut). Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Music section suggestion

Should we mention how the score makes multiple nods to the score of The Wrong Trousers? Visokor (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if you can find a reliable secondary source showing that. Popcornfud (talk) 17:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]