Talk:WWE New Year's Revolution

Feedback

Here's somewhat of a feedback:

• Unlink the dates, per here.
• PWWEW.net might be a source problem, might be best to replace them.

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

• • Done. iMatthew (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

SRX

Here is my feedback.

• • The history only talks about the bouts and matches at the event but nothing about the event's history in general, like it's name or things in that nature, it needs less about the matches and more about it's own history.
  • I feel this will get shot down at FLC because the list is too short, what this could be made into however is a good article with more expansion on the prose like a reception section.
  • For a thorough example see the FL, WWE No Way Out.

--S_RX 23:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

• • • So do you recommend that I nominate this for FA instead of FL (when it's ready of course). iMatthew (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Nikki

I was coming here to mention the same issue that SRX brought up. In December 2007, WWE One Night Stand was nominated at FLC and failed because it was too short (see Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/WWE One Night Stand). That article's list section was longer than this article's list section, so there is a good chance this one will fail for the same reason. I'm not telling you not to nominate it...I just wanted you to be aware of the precedent. Nikki311 17:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Also, Featured Articles/Lists are much stricter on sources, so it might be best to replace the PWWEW and OWOW. Since they only cited results (I think), SLAM! Wrestling would work as a replacement. Nikki311 17:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

• • Done. Also, should I nominate this for FA instead of FL? iMatthew (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on WWE New Year's Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071203215504/http://www.wwe.com/shows/newyearsrevolution/history/2005/results/ to http://www.wwe.com/shows/newyearsrevolution/history/2005/results/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wwe.com/shows/nowayout/exclusives/chamberhistory/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wwe.com/shows/nowayout/matches/5908216/results/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wwe.com/shows/nowayout/matches/6364982/results/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223101434/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2006/2006_05_25_02.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2006/2006_05_25_02.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)